| Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,078 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1543 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
309 Posts |
They all have "issues." The Mexico cob would likely date to the 1600s and looks real but is missing much information. The 1726 French Ecu has graffiti and oddly its mint mark which might be "H" for La Rochelle is blundered. The Mexican Cap & Ray dollar is not good and the last coin needs to be looked up, but has significant wear. Truly this is an odd lot!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1543 Posts |
The last one is the one I was most interested in but also the one I was unsure about. Its a Tollero under Cosimo III for Livorno 167?.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1543 Posts |
Guess someone didn't think so
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
They are certainly all problem coins.
The 1834/3 Do RM 8R is in my opinion most likely a genuine coin. If it was counterfeit, or if I suspect it most likely was I would be bidding.
The 1726 Mexican Ecu is possibly a counterfeit. But I am not 100% certain.
The other two I would have zero interest in.
The price is already far too high.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
John S. Davenport many, many decades ago warned of high quality counterfeit and fake European crown sized silver coins.
With the severe lack of pictorial detail shown here, it would be impossible for me to make a decision to even consider them, let alone 'pull the trigger' to buy.
I would very much prefer to examine each item closely in hand first, even given a cast iron guarantee that they were all genuine. The stakes are too high for me otherwise.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1543 Posts |
Quote: I would very much prefer to examine each item closely in hand first, Of course. Quote: The price is already far too high Yeah, It went over what I would have bid even if I thought they were all genuine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7940 Posts |
My only two guesses are that the French ecu is real, but with later graffiti, and that the date of the Livorno tallero may have been tampered with. It looks like 1678, which may be an unlisted date? If it is 1675, the last digit looks too large in relation to the three smaller digits that precede it (I could not find a photo of any date in the 1670s for comparison, so that comment pertains to later dates of the same type). And yep, somebody(ies) thought enough of them were real to bid it up pretty high despite the poor condition. Edit: I found an image of a 1675 Tallero (maybe you already did @gincoin), and the last digit is considerably thicker than the 7, and also rounded enough to be mistaken for an 8 with wear, so I think this coin is likely a 1675. Maybe this is where the buyer saw value, as it is quite a rare date for the type? https://www.acsearch.info/search.ht...us=1&order=0¤cy=usd&company=
Edited by tdziemia 09/20/2020 6:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1543 Posts |
That is most likely the case tdz
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,078 |
|