| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,439 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1326 Posts |
These are seller's images. Hope they're adequate. I paid $63. Coin is returnable.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5675 Posts |
The photos don't show much luster, and I suspect the surfaces aren't as nice as they seem. I'd say perhaps MS-64, but there's a possibility that it's overdipped or even an AU slider.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18685 Posts |
AU58. luster has been mostly removed based on these photos. I think you overpaid on this one
Edited by panzaldi 09/21/2020 08:38 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
614 Posts |
Get it back in the mail. I had two of those last month and returned them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Agreed, without better pics AU58-64. Price is fair for MS64 on up, anything less, return it. Definitely post in hand pics when it arrives.
Edited by Ty2020b 09/21/2020 08:45 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I don't think I would buy from these pics.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts |
as pictured, it;s a $26 coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
The photos don't show much detail.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
119 Posts |
The lustre seems impaired in the photos. I'd say AU-58, and I wouldn't buy off of these photos.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
442 Posts |
I don't like pics taken from that angle. Unless they also include some straight on ones.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1326 Posts |
Quote: as pictured, it;s a $26 coin. I thought you were nuts...until I actually got the coin! I'm sending it back. Thanks for peoples' feedback.
|
|
New Member
United States
18 Posts |
Luster looks off to me as well. I'm glad you were able to return as this one didn't look quite right from pics for the price.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,439 |
|