Posted 10/13/2020 12:48 pm
...Well, 63 or 61; there's no legend on the reverse that I could see, and the types are almost identical otherwise. I'd hedge the differences and say Tesorillo 130.
I'm leaning toward barbarous (or, at least, very crude) rather than worn, but it's hard to tell. Both coins are slightly smaller and slighly heavier than Esty's examples, and both have a circular line on reverse in the area where a legend would be expected (on the larger coin, it's very clear on the left side; on the smaller coin, a piece is visible right at the edge at 7-8 hours).
I'm leaning toward barbarous (or, at least, very crude) rather than worn, but it's hard to tell. Both coins are slightly smaller and slighly heavier than Esty's examples, and both have a circular line on reverse in the area where a legend would be expected (on the larger coin, it's very clear on the left side; on the smaller coin, a piece is visible right at the edge at 7-8 hours).
