Quote:
There's a big problem with the second slide...there is no dependence of depth of field based on sensor size. This is a myth, and is absolutely untrue. I have no idea why it keeps on being propagated. The 3rd slide is a good one to explain why folks doing macro often prefer smaller sensors.
There's a big problem with the second slide...there is no dependence of depth of field based on sensor size. This is a myth, and is absolutely untrue. I have no idea why it keeps on being propagated. The 3rd slide is a good one to explain why folks doing macro often prefer smaller sensors.
You're right rmpsrpms.
I think the confusion comes from this. With smaller sensor size, we need shorter focal length to get the same field of view.
We know that the Depth of field if proportional to N/f^2
where N is the F-number and f the focal length.
So, a sensor 2 times smaller will use a shorter focal length by the same ratio to get the similar FOV.
The Depth of field will be then 4 times larger.
Most poeple think by considering only the sensor size and forget the optic specifications.
Edited by SP67
01/01/2021 11:07 am
01/01/2021 11:07 am






















