Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1862 IHC Oddity / Expertise, If You Please?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 891Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
284 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2021  2:08 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Kcm to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Backstory: A few days past, in my post, I mentioned Ed's collection, a complete IHC album I purchased in the late '70's. Mind in absentia, guided by Ed, I put the finishing touches to it by adding the few missing keys.

@suipakpaikungfu asked me to post up the whole thing on CCF. I hadn't visited Ed's collection in a while. @suipakpaikungfu reawakened my erstwhile plan to explore the five oddities Ed placed in five unlabeled slots at bottom of the last page.

The oddities are dated 1862, 1872, 1879, 1900, and 1908. I'll post one coin at a time in hope that - having lost both beloved Ed and Ed's wisdom to the march of time - I might recover insight from experts on CCF.1862 is appended to this post; 1872, 1879, 1900, and 1908 will follow in separate posts.

Failure on my part to reveal my inexpert assumptions about these coins to the experts would be disingenuous and also sidestep the fun I find in being expertly corrected.

!862: I assume this is PMD, but that, to me, is like suggesting Michelangelo damaged the ceiling of the Cistine Chapel by spilling paint all over it. Please indulge me with your knowledge - or, perhaps, your assumptions?

Please disregard the glare from the tiny neodyium magnets I used to set up the shot of the coin's edge

Kevin

1862-IHC-Oddity-/-Expertise,-If-You-Please?
1862-IHC-Oddity-/-Expertise,-If-You-Please?
1862-IHC-Oddity-/-Expertise,-If-You-Please?
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2021  3:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can only assume that this is a deliberate alteration for whatever reason. The notching gaps are not even regular.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
chafemasterj's Avatar
United States
6514 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2021  3:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chafemasterj to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am no expert myself but I too would assume PMD too.
Check out my counterstamped Lincoln Cent collection:
http://goccf.com/t/303507
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2021  3:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Seems to be some type of PMD. Maybe it was in a bezel of some kind? I do not see that happening at the mint.
John1
Pillar of the Community
Rothery's Avatar
2145 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2021  3:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rothery to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Back in the day coins were carved to make pie crust crimpers. Your coin may have been a start of one that was never finished.
1862-IHC-Oddity-/-Expertise,-If-You-Please?
Edited by Rothery
02/16/2021 3:32 pm
Valued Member
United States
284 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2021  4:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kcm to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Fabulous feedback! I especially appreciate the image of the Indian Head piecrust crimper. I'm studied into Rick Snow's first volume at 1862. I've always held a tight grasp of history but Rick's mapping of the history I devoured by his narrative's restricted reference to minting and coinage is somehow new for me. 1861: Lincoln inaugurated; South Carolina's legislature votes unanimously to secede. 1862: Lincoln attempts to resupply Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor. etc.

The nation suddenly at war with itself.... The devices on that coin -- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?!? Not in that year; maybe nevermore! The sudden perceived need to hoard and protect coinage quickly leading to scraps of government issued paper marked 25 cents, 50 cents etc. (fractional currency). Ergo, the idea of the coin being modified to be secured in a bezel also feels awful good to me. Yes, a coin / no not a coin. Coins have waxed precious


This far along in discussion, I wonder how this "damage" was accomplished. Given the condition of the edge, the "grade of the pre-damaged coin, and the uniformity of the spacing, I'm thinking the coin must have been re-inserted into a (post-mint -- machine shop) press and re-struck using commercial shop dies. Fun guessing!

Kevin
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 891Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums