| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 2,061 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Philippines
606 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Im not sure that this coin is gradeable ,, Its been my experiance that its impossible to have a one sided blank coin that is a struck error, its almost certianly damage and that being the case the coin would not be gradeable .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Spain
1361 Posts |
I have seen one sided error coins before.
|
|
Valued Member
Brazil
379 Posts |
Is it even an error? Looks like the one side has been filed down a bit. Any way to post a higher detailed pic/scan? Do you have a way to weigh it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Quote: I have seen one sided error coins before. One sided struck coins ? the minting process has a problem with that , it takes an anvil die and a hammer die to impart the design to the coin ,,both side are struck at the same time .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
 with Metalman. There are a few errors that can obscure one side of the coin, but nothing will produce a flat, rimless obverse or reverse. I think that one side of the coin was ground off after minting and cannot be given a grade. If this is a 1917-S 5c, then US minting standards apply 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Spain
1361 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
In respect to Augbauer's coin, I think the photo above provides some good clues as to what happened to this coin  Prior to a coin's striking, the blank planchet was run through an upsetting mill, which forms a raised rim equally on both sides. When the coin is struck, the pressure pushes coin metal against the die collar, further reinforcing the edge. Even if some kind of strike error produced a blank side, there would be evidence of a rim. As it is, the coin above has a normally struck rim on one side, while the opposite is missing both the design and raised rim. It's far more plausible to conclude one side was ground off. It was a common practice during this time as coins were often engraved on one side as mementos. I enlarged the blank side to see if I could see signs of engraving, but I do see marks that suggest a physical process used to remove the design and rim: 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Philippines
606 Posts |
Sirs, thank you for your efforts. I think this coin may have been damaged in the past due to the severe scratches in its obverse. As to KurtS, Sir, thank you for your perfect explanation on this topic.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
You're welcome Augbauer--I'm imperfect, but I do try to be helpful. 
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 2,061 |
|