Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1960 Lincoln Memorial Cent - Fake?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 28 / Views: 2,953Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
SilverCents's Avatar
United States
3281 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  08:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SilverCents to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Whatever it is, I think we can agree it's quite the coin for discussion.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Yokozuna's Avatar
United States
4618 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  08:36 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Yokozuna to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow! Could this have been a rusted die? The pitting seems too widely spaced for this to be struck with a sandcast die. I really have no idea either way!

If you get a definitive answer, please let us know.
ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!!
1960-Lincoln-Memorial-Cent---Fake?


Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  08:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The head has the chiseled look of a 1909-1915 era wheat. Never seen anything like it.
Pillar of the Community
SamCoin's Avatar
United States
3237 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  09:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SamCoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To quote Sandy Koufax, "the question is 'why.'"
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  09:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
But note the engraving on the '6' that is on all the small dates:
1960-Lincoln-Memorial-Cent---Fake?
You can see it, with the belly button lint on top of it.
Valued Member
JohnH4444's Avatar
206 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  10:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JohnH4444 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
My guess is someone tried to turn a large date into a small date for what ever reason. probably tooled the coin itself, or made fake dies from a large date and made it look like a small date
Edited by JohnH4444
05/26/2021 10:37 am
Pillar of the Community
QuarterHoarder72's Avatar
United States
2156 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  11:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add QuarterHoarder72 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting coin. I would've come to the "fake" conclusion as well. Quite a cool example though.
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5240 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  4:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
TB, I can dang sure see why you would question this cents authenticity.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2021  7:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Keep in mind they didn't create new masters each year. The master hub was used several years. So the earlier coin has the smaller head on the die, as it was still fresh many years. Some of the master hubs had some alterations on them. Thus some year/s had the same issue over a long period of time. So in the 1960's the hub was swelling wider. Making the devices large and the bust a lot larger. So when a very hub polishing took place it, with the fields reduced, the devices would appear smaller and the bust would be weaker. That is what I feel we are seeing on both sides of this coin. Very heavy polishing reduced the normal sizes of the devices. In 1969 they replaced the aged master hub. Since the mid 1980's they create new masters every year.

1960-Lincoln-Memorial-Cent---Fake?
1960-Lincoln-Memorial-Cent---Fake?
Edited by coop
05/26/2021 8:56 pm
Pillar of the Community
tropicalbats's Avatar
United States
6116 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2021  12:32 am  Show Profile   Check tropicalbats's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add tropicalbats to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for all the great responses! This one is odd and it doesn't seem that there is a consensus yet. I haven't decided where I fall yet, as it really seems like a fake but can't put all the pieces together to figure out the how and why. Coop is in the abraded die camp, but it just seems like what looks abraded looks very, very abraded while other parts of the coin as super tall and crisp.

So here are two more images. The first is the date with the little bit of crud removed where the master doubling would be under the tip of the 6 on a small date. I just don't see it in hand at all. Of note, however, when I first saw the coin I thought it was a small date based on the overall look of the date.

The second image merely shows what some of the letters look like using a transverse view. Very tall and insanely sharp lines and corners. I realize that would be deep in the die, but usually abraded dies just don't look this crisp.

And a question. I think I see subtle differences in the hair outline. Something like that might occur between a proof and a business strike. What would a coin look like that was a proof strike on a business strike planchet? The edges of the coin are definitely beveled and it's a business strike planchet not a proof planchet.

Thanks again for all the comments! I still wonder what this one is.


1960-Lincoln-Memorial-Cent---Fake?
1960-Lincoln-Memorial-Cent---Fake?
Pillar of the Community
QuarterHoarder72's Avatar
United States
2156 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2021  12:43 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add QuarterHoarder72 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
So weird. The crispness of the T doesn't look like abrasion to me, leading me to believe it's counterfeit. However, I can see why abrasion would cause such an appearance. This is a toughie, but I think I'll have to fall in the counterfeit side of the debate. Honestly, it could be either though. I'm curious to see what else others say about it.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2021  2:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well back to the die polishing. Why would that area be polished. They only work on the areas where a clash happened. That area is not a target area for clash marks on the first 'T', so it would probably not be affected.
With the obstruction removed, it maybe just a large date. (Something I hadn't consider yet) But with the weight is normal, then my next question would be? Why would anyone make a counterfeit of a coin that no one would want. Counterfeiters are into this to make something desirable. Nothing desirable copied for this coin? The small date plains are not that expensive to make a fake example for.
Pillar of the Community
CoinHunter27's Avatar
United States
5887 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2021  2:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinHunter27 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That looks fake to me. Date is so far off I can't see it being mere polishing that brought it to this point. LIBERTY also looks very wrong to me. IMO this is a counterfeit. I just can't see die polishing altering the devices this drastically that the whole obverse looks off. Of course, this is just my opinion so if anyone can prove my wrong go right ahead.

Very cool coin bats, and whatever it is it's making for quite the topic of discussion.

-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
  Previous TopicReplies: 28 / Views: 2,953Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.32 seconds to rattle this change. Forums