| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 2,298 |
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
Edited by RCarv
06/07/2021 4:37 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 200 Posts |
When I said what's below it, I meant the rasied area in the possible shape of a ear..
|
|
Valued Member
United States
356 Posts |
Definitely looks like something you have there but I don't believe it is FS-101. Your MM is not consistent with FS-101. Pretty neat whatever that is though. From your pics it looks like there is extra material below the ear.
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
I know its not the FS-101, I'm just calling it the mini me of FS-101 lol..
"Baby spike"
Edited by RCarv
06/07/2021 05:05 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
356 Posts |
Quote:
I know its not the FS-101, I'm just calling it the mini me of FS-101 lol..
"Baby spike" I like it!!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
No, this is not a doubled ear. I don't know what Scuba1 is seeing, but I think he or she would do well to read and observe more on here. I see a perfectly normal Lincoln Penny with a slight stain under the ear. |
|
New Member
24 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
Edited by RCarv
06/07/2021 2:53 pm
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
Not the stain making it look like a doubled ear, and I did hit it with Acetone to make sure..
Directly underneath the ear has a rasied area in the shape of of spike.
I will try to take more clear pics..
I think I may have fixed my scope..
I added alot of light buffer to it..
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
I fixed my issues with pictures not coming out like I see on live feed..
So happy!!
Pretty hard to blame this on a Stain, flat spot or Dirt.. pretty straight forward what it is.. no camera tricks.. pictures taken vertical from doubled ear
Edited by RCarv
06/07/2021 4:41 pm
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
Pretty sure this is called the classic doubled ear lobe style..
|
|
Valued Member
200 Posts |
Thank you scuba for the congrats..
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
If the images were rotated to horizontal, We could see if the bottom of the lobe is normal or reduced from damage? A side by side would show what is there or what is not there.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
356 Posts |
Quote:
I don't know what Scuba1 is seeing, but I think he or she would do well to read and observe more on here. Ya know Sam...... There is a much more polite way of expressing your opinion than how you did it in your post directed at me (or better yet, not posting such an insulting comment at all). All I said was that I liked what I was seeing from the OP's pictures and if you read my first post I clearly explained that I believed it was not the listed variety FS-101 just FYI. For you to suggest I "read and observe more on here" is quite frankly an insult. I did or said nothing wrong in my post as I politely said it looked like extra material and then later posted that "I liked it". Here is my first post on this thread, in case you missed it, in defense of your insulting comment towards me. Have a good evening Sam. Quote:
Definitely looks like something you have there but I don't believe it is FS-101. Your MM is not consistent with FS-101. Pretty neat whatever that is though. From your pics it looks like there is extra material below the ear. |
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
Ok, I am just going to say what I am sure many members aren thinking. RCarv I just re-read all of your posts, along with every response and I was not able to see any change in your determination to prove to all who read your posts. Given all of the experts very patient feedback one would think you would do research to prove your point. The experts are going so far as to tell you exactly what you need to research to find the true answer.
But you continue to post what you think or know you are seeing. With way too many very below average pics that you you say clearly show what you are claiming. There has not been anything on your coins that you are positive that are there. Yet you continue to post more pics of more coins that you claim have outrageous impossible errors. You back your claims up by saying that you know what you have because you have the coin in hand, and discount what the consensus of expert opinions.
To summarize your posts.
You believe All of the coins you have posted are legit errors.
You repeatedly discount All of the experts opinions.
You believe you are proving your cases with admittedly bad pics which you do not try to improve.
Defending your posts by saying you know what you have because you have the coin in hand.
So I ask, if all of what you claim is in fact exactly what you have, why do you post and ask for opinions?
Your posts are combative, sarcastic, rude, and exhausting. What is your goal?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
@Scuba1 your comment in this particular thread happened to be extremely counterproductive. Read Altec12's comment. This user RCarv has been posting coins and getting extremely combative when told they aren't errors or varieties for the past several days. When you come in here and cosign on a non-variety like this and tell that person that you see it too, you undermine a lot of hard work trying to make progress with this user.
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,298 |
Posted 06/06/2021 7:58 pm
