| Author |
 Replies: 9 / Views: 1,002 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
512 Posts |
not sure about this coin, may be polished.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5720 Posts |
I'd say XF or low AU details. Possibly an old cleaning, but more concerning is what looks like some early pitting on the obverse.
Addendum: on second thought, the date and letters look a little suspect. You sure it's genuine?
Edited by Zurie
06/12/2021 12:12 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
606 Posts |
Looks OK to me
Watch your top knot
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Zurie took the words right out of my mouth .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2018 Posts |
Overall it looks OK to me too but I do see a few pimples in the fields of both obverse and reverse which always raise a red flag with me. Have you weighed and measured the coin?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21792 Posts |
Would much rather see good quality pics of coins in the 'raw', than slabbed. They are easier to grade from on screen pictures.
This coin has been cleaned a long time ago, and has since re-toned.
IMO, the small pits are minor sharp point impact damage; for me, that would not be a deal breaker at this grade.
Nevertheless, still a desirable coin; I wouldn't mind having it my collection.
The wear on Lib's boobs consistent with
EF-45
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say AU-53, possibly details for reasons noted.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18924 Posts |
i have to go with AU details also
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
AU50 Details for me. Not a fan of obverse spotting.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
37154 Posts |
AU-53 details, environmental damage. Lots of corrosion still in the skirt above the knee.
The coin is genuine.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,002 |
|
Posted 06/12/2021 06:21 am
