Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1901 Barber Dime For Grading

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 2,033Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
kbbpll's Avatar
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2021  2:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I would love to find out why these minor changes came about.
For the dimes, Bowers states in his Barber Silver Coins guide that the 1901 obverse changes lowered the relief, and that Liberty subsequently did not wear away as quickly. The relief for the 1900 Reverse 2 change also seems flatter to me. Other speculation regards die life - there are several letters back and forth between the branch mints and Barber around 1900 regarding die life. Coin stacking differences are noted as a reason for changes to the quarter in 1892 and possibly again in 1900, and Bowers also mentions lowering of the relief for quarters resulting in Liberty not wearing as quickly.

I've been mulling over the reason for the addition of the "thick ribbon" in 1901, as it appears to be the only change to the reverse design, and the 1900 design only lasted a little over a year. I have noted that many 1900-1901 Reverse 2 coins across all mints have a die gouge below the right ribbon, exactly where the thick ribbon later appears. Barber may have been picky and wanted to cover this up on a master die, or perhaps he intended the 1900 change to have the thick ribbon, started to engrave it, and didn't finish? Otherwise, the 1901 obverse changes, and the addition of the thick ribbon, more closely resemble features on the 1891 pattern coin. Perhaps Barber simply thought "I really wanted it to look more like this" and finally got around to it? Idle speculation on my part.
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36777 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2021  3:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I never expected this thread to turn into such an education. Thank's kbbpll, I learned a lot from this.
Rest in Peace
dave700x's Avatar
United States
10625 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2021  3:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah, my initial thought was it may have been to improve the die life.
I don't recall any known reason or even speculation in Bower's book on Morgan dollars for the C3 to C4 hub change. I'll have to dust it off and look now..

edit to add - no explanation or speculation as to why the C3 to C4 hub change in the Morgan RedBook....
Edited by dave700x
07/29/2021 5:02 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 2,033Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums