Hello Petespockets55,
No successful meds yet, lol! In fact I "quit collecting" a couple years ago and since then have acquired 96 more purchased coins. There's no hope.
My "In the holder since" is designed and intended to inform collectors of how long the coin has resided in its current holder, not when it was slabbed. Further this "in its holder since" I publish is only the time I have first hand knowledge of. In other words I may have owned a slabbed coin for 10 years so I publish "in this holder since at least 2011". However the coin could have been slabbed 10 years prior to my acquisition.
My intent in providing this information to collectors is rooted in the very real dynamic of gradeflation. Grading standards have, do and will always continue to change. They absolutely must for
TPG to remain in business. Every time grading standards shift a half point hundreds of thousands of coins lose market value. As such many collectors chase that value through regrading. So, instead of investing tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars constantly chasing labels I simply post how long I
know a coin has been in its holder. This information gives collectors that are privy to gradeflation and collecting coins, not labels, valuable information that pertains to the accuracy of the label in relation to current market standards.
Most collectors of 5 years or more acknowledge that most 67's today would have been 66's five years ago and 65's five years before that.
I'm far more about supporting collectors and the hobby than greed. Don't get me wrong, I like money just as much as anyone. I just believe acquisition of paper dollars should be a byproduct of effort and integrity, not a primary goal.
If someone (or I) get a coin regraded and placed in a new holder then that coin would "be in this holder" as of the day it was regraded and the cycle begins again.
Also, just to be clear, overall I support
TPG. They bring far more good to the hobby than bad. Personally I'd pay the fee they charge simply for the holder, serial number and databases. Their opinion of grade at a given point in time is a bonus. Equally however, with gradeflation, intrinsically the grade can become a substantial negative.
Hope this helps explain my reasoning.
Kind regards,
E.J.