Normally I would never bother with a common more modern date like this, I found it in a roll today and the detail seems much better then the average one I come across, I can't see this not being MS something. Unfortunately there is a tiny finger print and some toning that seems a bit weird. What do you guys think? Its an upgrade to my current 87 without a doubt just based on detail.


I'll post some better images after work these are just to show the level of detail. Maybe it's normal and I just haven't seen an uncirculated 87.
Natural lighting pics


I'm going to guess grade between ms 62-64,the Marc's below DG on the obverse and the above KG on the reverse keep it below 65. Iv never tried to grade the more modern portrait coins.