| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,557 |
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12250 Posts |
Post #8,000! Who woulda thunk it? Not me!In February 1948, companion Joint Resolutions were introduced in the Senate and House of Representatives that called for 50-cent pieces to be struck "in commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the termination of the War with Spain." The Resolutions called for up to 250,000 half dollars to benefit the United Spanish War Veterans (USWV), a nation-wide organization of veterans of the War with Spain. The USWV, formed in 1904, was broader in its membership scope than just the Spanish-American War of 1898-99, it also included veterans of the Philippine-American War that followed it (1899-1902) and the Chinese Relief Expedition (aka, The Boxer Rebellion) of 1900-01. The focus of the bill, however, was specific to the termination of the Spanish-American War. The bill was open-ended in terms of the Mint facilities that could be used - P/D/S Sets were a possibility. The Resolutions incorporated an uncommon provision, the coins could be struck only in 1948 and 1949 with the coins bearing the date of the year in which they were struck; no specific mintage numbers/limits were set for either year. This combination of provisions could have created a six-coin program - 1948 P/D/S and 1949 P/D/S - with either balanced or unbalanced annual mintages or even artificially-created scarcities! Per the Resolutions, the coins could be sold by the Veterans at a premium, with net proceeds going toward supporting the planned 50th anniversary activities of the Veterans and, if funds remained, toward the organization's general support of its members; the Resolutions referenced the fact that the organization was then struggling financially. The struggle was likely due, at least in part, to the fact that a three-quarters majority of veterans from the war were deceased by 1948 and thus no longer dues-paying members. (The organization ceased in 1992 with the passing of its last veteran member.) The Senate Resolution was introduced first, but the House Resolution followed just a few days later and saw more action from Congress. After being referred to the House Committee on Banking and Currency, it was included in a Committee Hearing in April 1948. At the Hearing, it became very clear that the funds generated from coin sales were to be used to keep the Washington Office of the USWV open vs. primarily being used to fund anniversary observances - this was stated openly by Roy Orchard Woodruff (R-MI), the Representative who introduced the House Joint Resolution. The Hearing also included testimony by Lloyd Thurston, a former member of Congress and the then-current USWV chairman of the committee to observe the 50th anniversary of the Spanish-American War. It has to be among the most biased and factually inaccurate Committee testimonies I have ever read. His testimony alone would have made me take a position against the coin bill had I been a Committee member. The Committee reported the Resolution favorably, however, and the House passed it without debate. The Resolution was sent to the Senate where it was immediately referred to the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency. The Senate Committee never reported the Resolution out, however, and it ultimately died for lack of action. All things considered - and my comment above notwithstanding - I think this coin proposal had merit and I wouldn't mind having a type coin of it in my collection. (Especially considering my fondness for the US-Philippines coinage series!) For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, including more What If? stories, see: Commems Collection. Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree this would have been a fine subject for a commemorative. Remember the Maine!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote: Post #8,000! Who woulda thunk it? Not me! Congratulations!  Quote: All things considered - and my comment above notwithstanding - I think this coin proposal had merit and I wouldn't mind having a type coin of it in my collection. I agree.  Thank you as always for sharing your knowledge! 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15382 Posts |
Congratulations on your 8000 post milestone commems - I say each of every one of them has been impactful to the general knowledge sharing for our coin community.
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12250 Posts |
Thanks for the kind words - always appreciated!
.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5177 Posts |
Quote: Agree this would have been a fine subject for a commemorative. Remember the Maine! A great book of fiction that involves the Maine was written by Clive Cussler: "Havana Storm".
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12250 Posts |
A quick revisit of my original post to fill out the story a bit by presenting the "Whereas" section included in the House and Senate Joint Resolutions introduced on behalf of the United Spansh War Veterans:
"Whereas the year 1948 marks the fiftieth anniversary of the termination of the War with Spain; and
Whereas the valiant services of the volunteer memhers of the armed forces of the United States hrought such armed conflict to a quick conclusion; and
Whereas three-fourths of the veterans of the War with Spain are now deceased; and
Whereas the surviving memhers of the United Spanish War Veterans, the only Nation-wide organization of veterans of the War with Spain, are having difficulty in financing their national organization in the future."
As a bit of additional background on the organization:
The United Spanish War Veterans was incorporated - after operating for decades - in Washington, DC via Public Law 76-473 in 1940. It published the Proceedings of its annual encampment, through the 1989 meeting, in a Report to Congress.
The organization continued on for 44 years after the coin resolutions were introduced/failed in 1948, ceasing in 1992 when its last surviving member died; he was a veteran of the Philippine-American War.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
354 Posts |
You must have a nearly inexhaustible source of reference material. Always a fascinating read.
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12250 Posts |
Quote: You must have a nearly inexhaustible source of reference material. I have spent 2,000+ hours assembling the material, so I do have a bit.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems 09/17/2023 10:08 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Only 2,000 hours? 
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
  United States
12250 Posts |
Quote:Only 2,000 hours? Honestly, I've stopped counting!
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3634 Posts |
Thanks for the update, commems! Quote: I have spent 2,000+ hours assembling the material, so I do have a bit. Still looking forward to when you publish a book...  I'll be first in line to buy a copy 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5601 Posts |
Another Fascinating Topic, " Maine was sent to Havana Harbor to protect U.S. interests during the Cuban War of Independence. She exploded and sank on the evening of 15 February 1898, killing 268 sailors, or three-quarters of her crew. In 1898, a U.S. Navy board of inquiry ruled that the ship had been sunk by an external explosion from a mine. However, some U.S. Navy officers disagreed with the board, suggesting that the ship's magazines had been ignited by a spontaneous fire in a coal bunker. The coal used in Maine was bituminous, which is known for releasing firedamp, a mixture of gases composed primarily of flammable methane that is prone to spontaneous explosions. An investigation by Admiral Hyman Rickover in 1974 agreed with the coal fire hypothesis, penning a 1976 monograph that argued for this conclusion. The cause of her sinking remains a subject of debate.[4] The ship lay at the bottom of the harbor until 1911, when a cofferdam was built around it.[5] The hull was patched up until the ship was afloat, then she was towed to sea and sunk. Maine now lies on the seabed 3,600 feet (1,100 m) below the surface. The ship's main mast is now a memorial in Arlington National Cemetery. "  I have a Awesome Photo or Depiction of The 1898 USS Battleship MAINE Exploding in Havana Harbor, Terrible Loss........
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote: Honestly, I've stopped counting! I am sure you are well past the 10,000 hour threshold for expertise. 
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,557 |
|