| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 922 |
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5667 Posts |
Hard to know for sure that it's MS from the photos. If it is, probably no higher than 62 because of the large gash on the cheek.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1511 Posts |
Assuming MS, I am at 62 as well. A typical weak strike for the year.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Grade aside, I find the coin unattractive. Not much more money will buy a much nicer coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18657 Posts |
no. poor photos are hiding stuff. the strike is weak for an 04(O) and there is more than we are seeing on that obverse. the photos are on purpose to deceive. PASS
at best MS63 and thats being generous
|
|
Valued Member
 Germany
312 Posts |
I had assumed the gash is just in the luster. I think the MS-62 examples on the grading pages look significantly worse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5667 Posts |
Quote:
I had assumed the gash is just in the luster. When buying from bad photos, it's usually best not to give the benefit of the doubt. |
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
Probably right. Ok guys, thanks for pointing out wishful thinking. I will pass this one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18657 Posts |
Quote:
When buying from bad photos, it's usually best not to give the benefit of the doubt. most excellent advice |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36737 Posts |
I'm at MS-62, very distracting facial marks.
|
|
New Member
Canada
36 Posts |
Low MS, but it's been heavily dipped.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2596 Posts |
ms62 or ms63 depends on how the cheek looks from different angles
Edited by jessvc1
09/11/2022 2:15 pm
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 922 |
|
Posted 09/11/2022 11:08 am
