Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1987 D Quarter With Crazy Strike Through

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 1,795Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
United States
172 Posts
 Posted 11/07/2022  2:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CRHunting to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hey Coop,
Thanks for taking a look and for creating the images! Yes, there are reeds on the outside of the coin just like you'd see on a normal coin. I hadn't considered a clad layer falling off post-strike as a potential explanation but it does match what we're looking at. So it sounds like both the clad falling off and the mechanical removal theories are both plausible explanations. Is there anyway to determine which is the more likely cause?

Let me know if there are any other images or information I can provide to help.

Thanks again!

1987-D-Quarter-With-Crazy-Strike-Through
1987-D-Quarter-With-Crazy-Strike-Through
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts
 Posted 11/07/2022  3:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JTCC to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
intresting find.
Valued Member
United States
172 Posts
 Posted 11/07/2022  3:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CRHunting to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree, it's definitely an interesting one. What's throwing me off is the fabric-like pattern that exists in multiple places around the coin mostly residing very close to the boundaries between the anomaly and the unaffected parts of the coin. If that didn't exist I'd be heavily in favor of the mechanically altered/polished theory. I just wouldn't expect to see that kind of pattern on a coin that was simply polished down. On the other hand, the anomaly being so centered and circular seems like it would have to be incredibly coincidental for it to be a mint error. This one is definitely a head-scratcher for me.
  Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 1,795Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.18 seconds to rattle this change. Forums