Quote:
So is that SOP in the past to issue coins with a sovereign that died the prior year?
Sorry I missed this question when it was posted a few weeks ago.
No, it is not "SOP" for mints to issue "wrong year" or "wrong monarch" coins. But the last time a British monarch died (1952), coinage production was a much smaller affair, and NCLT coins effectively didn't exist. Mints didn't have marketing departments and generally produced coins that had the current correct date on them, rather than the modern mint SOP of ante-dating coins so the marketing department can sell and ship them in time for Christmas.
Quote:
I got some because for 2023 they're be some with Queen, some with King, which I don't know if that has happened before.
I'm pretty sure neither Britain nor any of its colonies has issued coinage depicting two different monarchs in the same year; not since 1820 when George III died, anyway. This is mainly because the process for obtaining an official coinage portrait is usually much longer than what we saw with Charles III. Mints usually continued to make coins with the late monarch's portrait, and the previous year's date, until the new portrait was ready. George III died on 29th January, so there was enough time to get a new coinage portrait out and strike some circulating coins.
You can tell the problem has been the portrait, because coin series that lack the portrait show no such inhibitions. The Indian state of Kutch managed to issue coins for
all three different British monarchs dated 1936: George V, Edward VIII and George VI. But these are typical "Indian States" coins that have no portrait, nor even English language inscriptions.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis