Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1959 D WRPM-003 MMm Or Ufo?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 27 / Views: 1,672Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
United States
877 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2023  10:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dowhat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ya'll gotta help me out here. Am I missing something?
As far as I understood things, the dude with the MM punch received the die after all the other stuff was on it. He took the die, placed his punch on it, and struck the die in a relatively correct position.
I have to consider the odds of positioning the punch and then striking it in this way off base area. Especially without leaving a hint of a hit on the 9.
Are you suggesting the MM strike was prior to the ingraving of the date. If so, please explain.
I must be missing something. Help me understand.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
97208 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2023  10:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No, the MM under the date was added after. Take note that it is shallow compared to the date, which means that the die was finished and ready to receive the MM last. Besides I believe that all the dies were made in Philadelphia, then shipped to Denver or San Francisco. Then each mint added their own MM on site.
Pillar of the Community
silviosi's Avatar
Canada
6244 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2023  11:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
DEAR is right. Was the mint procedures in that year. Is not clear, clear but it is the most plausible explanation till now.
Pillar of the Community
United States
877 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2023  07:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dowhat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, just as I stated in the first paragraph in my previous reply.
Therefor, for this to be a RPM, one must surmise that the punch was carelessly placed above the 9, and struck without leaving any visible damage to the numeral. This seems highly unlikely to me. Coincidental similarity to the D. Probably a die dent. Also, if it is PMD, one would expect some damage to the 9 as well. Just my opinion.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
97208 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2023  08:16 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Right, Which is why in one of my earlier replies up above (when I was playing 'Devils Advocate') that I asked if this could just be a die dent - just like the feature just to the right of the date could also be a die dent.
If not a dent, then yes, an RPM is what it would be.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
97208 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2023  08:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Therefor, for this to be a RPM, one must surmise that the punch was carelessly placed above the 9, and struck

Is it possible that when the Mint Mark placer guy (gal?) was about to hit the MM into place , just suddenly sneezed and their had jerked a tiny bit as a result? In my books - yes - it is possible.
I have a condition that causes me to 'just start sneezing without any pre-curser of one coming up.
Pillar of the Community
United States
877 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2023  08:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dowhat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Leaving no discernable damage to the numeral? That would suggest an extreme angle on the punch.
I'm on the side of a damaged die.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
97208 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2023  09:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well you have to remember that the numerals are incuse on the die (recessed) and if the MM was lightly tapped onto that area over the 9 it would only mark up the field a little bit.
Pillar of the Community
United States
877 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2023  9:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dowhat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ah-hah. I totally missed that point. Now I have no opinion.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
97208 Posts
Pillar of the Community
NY Islander's Avatar
United States
981 Posts
 Posted 07/02/2023  10:19 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add NY Islander to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice set up Dutch-T....and gesundheit DB.
"We are all flawed, some MD and some PMD."
NYI
Edited by NY Islander
07/02/2023 10:29 am
Valued Member
Dutch-Tigger's Avatar
United States
301 Posts
 Posted 07/02/2023  1:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dutch-Tigger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@Dearborn

I am glad to see the discussion on this intriguing and controversial
Example of what is being labeled as "MMM" not RPM. As DearBorn mentioned the cavity of the 9 was not struck at its base so bears no trace of the said MMM.
The overlay of Billy G. Crawford has puzzled me for decades, as
Cujohn mentioned.
Quote:
To me that mark looks like the vertical of the D turned 45 degrees to the right. I don't see how Crawford's image even looks like a mint mark.

@Dowhat, I do think pushing such questions as you had does a world of good when it comes to such unique and quite possibly
an unknown event that occurred, this keeps us from Jumping the Shark" and is an integral part of examination.
@silviosi
Quote:
DEAR is right. Was the mint procedures in that year. Is not clear, clear but it is the most plausible explanation till now.

This is a very accurate mention about the past practices.
@NY Islander Thank you, I will need to take a breather from the
Forum Follies, all of them have been taking up what little time I have with working, I will be re shooting some coins so as to fit the requirements to fit here of some more interesting and controversial coins.
I vote "Good Post" and thank all of you for joining in on such a healthy debate, I have displayed this example in other places and found an equally strong debate.
  Previous TopicReplies: 27 / Views: 1,672Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.46 seconds to rattle this change. Forums