| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,188 |
|
New Member
United States
21 Posts |
I noticed another mint mark between the six and the three I was looking online at different RPMs and I can't find this coin. Does anyone have any information about it? 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Please if you talk about RPM show less focus the mint mark and not the date.
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
I focused on the date because between the 6th and the three is another D
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
I understand you, but the pics must be less focus to see. 10 to 50 x focus it is enough.
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
I'm sorry I'm still learning how to use this forum and make my images the correct size.
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
But there is clearly a D between the six and the three on the date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
The word for this is Pareidolia. The same reason people see faces on gnarled tree stumps or Jesus on their burnt grilled cheese sandwiches.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74015 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not seeing an RPM.  to the CCF!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
451 Posts |
Hi, That is a 1963 D WDDO 001 stage C, Great find. I think my father discovered that error coin. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
451 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
I don't see anything that matches WDDO-001. The MM is right of where it should be and what you think is the middle of the misplaced 3 is in the wrong spot. Pareidolia. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
451 Posts |
Hi, yes it is very circulated and the pic is good but not great. Nothing like having the coin in hand.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
451 Posts |
Hi, see if you can match any die markers on the 1963 D stage C. Then you can know for sure. Let us know if you can match them. Thanks Frank B.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
This is absolutely not WDDO-001
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,188 |