| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 5,338 |
|
|
New Member
United States
43 Posts |
Edited by MrShack33 10/05/2023 7:19 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73747 Posts |
It's not RDV-006. It's the normal RDV-005 reverse. Definitely not worth getting it grading at all.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6464 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
With these pictures, it looks right 006 Need a up close in focus picture of the FG. Even if it is it wouldn't be worth grading the carbon spots kills it.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
MrShack33, Please work on posting better quality photos. The better the photos you post the better we can help. In focus and less glare. John1 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94892 Posts |
Quote: Even if it is it wouldn't be worth grading the carbon spots kills it. that and all the fingerprints you are putting all over it will make this coin worth just 1 cent..
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
Bump. Still looks good to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5238 Posts |
I do not believe this is the FS-901. My reason is the first A in AMERICA is the same as it is on the RDV-005 and I have yet to see a clear closeup of the designers initials
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
If we look at the photos 4,5,6 and 7, then we can see that we have here an old die which will give impression of 006 (talk about FG). In fact IMHO it is not. The letters also show the 005 which never has the combine with 006.
Edited by silviosi 10/05/2023 9:37 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
43 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5238 Posts |
It is the RDV-005. You can draw a straight line in the gap between the top and bottom curl of the G and the line would touch both curls, 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
738 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 5,338 |
|