| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 869 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts |
I am much more confident this coin is an error. It appears to be double thickness with a deep rim on both sides. How would I accurately described this coin? 
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 Looks like it is in a bezel. Not a mint error. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree, once mounted.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9862 Posts |
Quote: How would I accurately described this coin? It's called an Encased Coin. It's not an error.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
51 Posts |
Now that you say that, I can see it. Sorry, it just never occurred to me that someone would do that.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73688 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3468 Posts |
Quote: Sorry, it just never occurred to me that someone would do that. It's amazing what people do with their things, there's just no end to it. Thanks for sharing that interesting find.
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24148 Posts |
We see about one a month here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 to the CCF Might have been a birth year bezel.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94786 Posts |
It could have been a 'birth' year' coin to memorialize it. Or a wedding date to remember it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
 Encased at some point. That said my eyes are drawn to the eyelid area. Is there an extra eyelid or am I seeing just a shadow trick? If nothing never mind. If something added, a straight on close up might help as well as a straight on close up of date with mint mark. Thanks, Doug.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
354 Posts |
I can't see an extra eye lid from that image. Maybe a better, straight on shot would help.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19115 Posts |
All said, a cool specimen.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 869 |
|