Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Did PCGS Standards Raise?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 2,616Next Topic  
New Member

Netherlands
32 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2009  4:39 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add skylerdmpl to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I have my most recent submission back from PCGS and to say I was shocked would be an understatement. On advise from at least few experts I played the crack-out game and lost big on this one. See examples below.

Just wondering if there is any insight as to whether or not PCGS have increased their standard just this year? See many of coins submitted got downgraded, especially the DMPL-PL-(non)PL status.

Also seems more scrutiny is given with new PGCS "Genuine" slab.

Any other recent experiences or did I just have a really unlucky submission?


Previous ANACS 1881-CC $1 MS65 DMPL
Now: PCGS 1881-CC MS63 PL
(major loss here!)
------------------------------
Previous ANACS 1881-S $1 MS65 PL
Now: PCGS 1881-S MS64 (no PL)
---------------------------
Previous: ANACS 1887 $1 MS65 PL
Now: PCGS Genuine (94 - Altered Surface)
(!)
------------------
Previous PCGS 1881-S MS 64-PL
Now: PCGS 1881-S MS 64
(no upgrade, lost PL)
--------------------------

Previous: ANACS 1880-S MS64-PL
Now: PCGS 1880-S AU58
(wow!)
-------------------------


I have many old PCGS DMPL slabs that I will dare not crack-out or even regrade now I fear it being downgraded to PL!
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
nohope587's Avatar
United States
5953 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2009  5:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nohope587 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am not sure how fair the test was a you were going from ANACS to PCGS for the most part and PCGS has always had the reputation of being the toughest graders...
Pillar of the Community
daviscfad's Avatar
United States
4541 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2009  5:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add daviscfad to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If you had had them in pcgs and then sent them to pcgs again I would see but there seems to be a kind of big difference between Anacs and PCGS
Bedrock of the Community
BH1964's Avatar
United States
10982 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2009  5:46 pm  Show Profile   Check BH1964's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add BH1964 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Previous PCGS 1881-S MS 64-PL
Now: PCGS 1881-S MS 64
(no upgrade, lost PL)


Did they pay you for the loss in value on this one?
ANA #R3154474
Moderator
Learn More...
vermontensium's Avatar
United States
16677 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2009  5:55 pm  Show Profile   Check vermontensium's eBay Listings Check vermontensium's eCrater Listings Bookmark this reply Add vermontensium to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah, PCGS is known for it's conservative grading. I'm not surprised by those grades although, we have not seeing your coins. As stated, ANACS is the most liberal of the big 3 IMO.

Quote:
Previous: ANACS 1887 $1 MS65 PL
Now: PCGS Genuine (94 - Altered Surface)

This one does surprise me
swcoin.ecrater.com
Edited by vermontensium
04/02/2009 5:59 pm
New Member
Netherlands
32 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2009  6:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add skylerdmpl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
For this one:

Previous PCGS 1881-S MS 64-PL
Now: PCGS 1881-S MS 64

PCGS did not pay me because I cracked-out hoping for better chance at getting a MS65-PL. They only pay you if you submit as regrade under their guarantee policy which I did not do. Was surprised to loose my PL status as coin seems to even be borderline DMPL! I am wondering if they are becoming more "precise" on how they determine reflectivity staus.


The PCGS Genuine (94 - Altered Surface) was a real shocker so I think I will resubmit to ANACS and see what happens.


Just browse around the recent submissions and see that PCGS is slabbing ALOT of coins with "Genuine" status. PCGS is running a ad now to submit your "problem" coins, but I am not sure that is the expectation for many of the submissions. I was always told that a coin gradable by ANACS would be gradable by PCGS. Well.. here is one case where that is proven to be wrong.

http://www.pcgs.com/membership/Shared.aspx
Pillar of the Community
QuickSilver's Avatar
United Kingdom
1077 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2009  7:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add QuickSilver to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just shows what a crock this whole third party grading scam is. No 2 people will grade a coin the same so why we rely so heavily on it is beyond me. I can see using it to determine authenticity, but beyond that it is subjective. Unfortunately it is now ingrained in the hobby.

You could get the same grader both times. One time the day after the birth of his child, the second time the day after his mom died, and I bet you get different results. Until a coin can be graded by a machine it will not be consistent. Never can be with Human beings involved.

As ever this is only my very humble opinion. (I hate slabs!)
Bedrock of the Community
Bryan1315's Avatar
United States
14454 Posts
 Posted 04/02/2009  10:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bryan1315 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
well anacs's DMPL is not PCGS DMPL, it has to have a full 8 or 10 inch mirror to be DMPL at PCGS I believe so an ANACS DMPL coming back PL doesn't surprise me. I would have been happy with an MS-65DMPL myself though
New Member
Netherlands
32 Posts
 Posted 04/03/2009  2:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add skylerdmpl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Brian1315: Agree with you that
Quote:
anacs's DMPL is not PCGS DMPL
but do you know more details to exact requirements? This is something that PCGS would not disclose when I asked.

As far as I know they measure 3 things:
1)mainly depth of reflectivity (but how many inches and how many precision points do they measure on each side) Maybe PCGS requires 8" on 12 different points and ANAC requires "6 and checks only 8 points for example? Maybe this is their secret?
2)degree of contrast
3) surface imperfections that distract from points 1&2 maybe qualify a downgrade from DMPL TO PL

<Also noted that PCGS requires DMPL on both sides - DMPL obverse with PL reverse will be downgraded to PL automatically - known>


Specifically though (and back to my original question), does anyone have any evidence that PCGS standards for DMPL have increased recently? I ask because I have many old PCGS slabs with DMPL status that are much duller that the ones now graded PL and I am in limbo whether or not to send any of them to regrade.


  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 2,616Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums