| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,343 |
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
This is not a Henning nickel in my opinion .
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
Hi there, thanks for the feedback. why would the weight be over 5 grams? noob here.... TIA
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1489 Posts |
5.06 g is well within tolerance for a normal nickel. The Henning nickels came in heavier — was it 5.4 g?
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
That makes sense, thank you
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1489 Posts |
Also, the D mintmark on your coin is a giveaway it is genuine, plus the dot near the Monticello dome is not in the right place for a Henning.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25195 Posts |
The 1953 Henning nickels do not have a D mint mark. Also, the lower left leg of the R in PLURIBUS is looped/holed. Please post a picture of the reverse of your coin.
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
Thanks everyone! appreciate it!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95984 Posts |
  not a Henning for the reasons described above.. (but at least you aware of them..)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 to the CCF and 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
59 Posts |
PowerSerg...
Show a complete photo of the reverse. There are other doe markers I discovered and are featured in my new book on Hennings
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6504 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1764 Posts |
@PowerSergNY  Need a good picture of the reverse, please. That would show/or not, most of the die marks. Does not appear to be a Henning nickel.
Edited by Sharks 06/19/2024 12:46 pm
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,343 |
|