| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,544 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
364 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
364 Posts |
here is the OBV/Rev......  
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
364 Posts |
doing this for a bump of the subject and to provide an update. So I sent it in to NGC and just listed it as a normal 1797 large cent (gave no indication that I though it was a gripped edge) and there initial cataloging designates it a Gripped Edge....its is definitely an s-134 , and PCGS info says that ALL gripped edge 1797 cents are one of two Sheldon numbers S-120b and S-121b.....here is NGC's initial submission log .... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
632 Posts |
Something happened at the Upsetting Mill, just not "Gripping"...
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
364 Posts |
What do you think could have happened? It is around the entire edge.....
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96771 Posts |
I never heard of a 'gripped edge' before.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1766 Posts |
 Glad I'm not the only one. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96771 Posts |
Quote: Glad I'm not the only one. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
632 Posts |
roach: or maybe it the planchet was supplied from Birmingham, it was one of those meant for somewhere else, and in something of a thinner stock. It obviously was upset where it was punched. I did have a 1798 S-176 (ex-Reynolds) overstruck on a British druid 1/2d token; the Mint-struck host was obviously from an English source. I also had an 1811 Bust Half, with partial edge lettering. The blank part had a few punctures, which led me to think part of the Castaing machine edge-lettering function failed. If it were an adjustable/removable rail, then it fell off...
Edited by Oldgrouchyguy 06/15/2024 9:22 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
632 Posts |
Edited by Oldgrouchyguy 06/28/2024 7:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
632 Posts |
Would others please check their examples of 1797 and early 1798 Large Cents, for similar edge boxing? There may be partial, or intermittent boxing. Thank you.
Edited by Oldgrouchyguy 07/01/2024 12:52 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Roach, that does not look like a gripped edge, mainly because of the spacing between the reeds and the depths the reeds were placed into. If your coin was worn down as it is, the deeply impressed reeds would still be very observable. As it sits, it is questionable which is why I would pass it off as a non-gripped edge. For everyone who is not familiar with the gripped edge, read your RedBook.  Oldgrouchyguy, are you saying your edge is squared off? Your coin clearly went through severe PMD as both the obverse and reverse were crushed flat. The edge was spooned with a hammer. Not a new edge discovery. - For fun, here is the S-79 Rarity-7 with the infamous reeded edge that was Dr. Sheldon's personal pocket piece! This is an obverse brockage, hence the mirrored image of Miss Liberty and the remaining obverse design elements. The reeded edge is not the same as the gripped edge, but a fun coin regardless.   
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
Edited by jacrispies 07/01/2024 8:14 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
632 Posts |
jacrispies: ooo those are nice pictures of the S-79! On mine, the boxes appear in a flat spot; otherwise the edge reminds me of 1798 stock: slightly convex, rounded (there is also a wire edge on the reverse above STAT). Heritage notes a boxed edge in their write-up of a S-121a sold last January. In light of that information, just a crazy thought: Since the boxing is known on the edge of a few varieties, maybe the Mint received a shipment of such planchets, and the Gripping is a response to that, by again passing the planchets through the milling process to erase that type of edge? At least a couple have escaped being struck by the S-120 die marriage... Crazy thought #2: maybe the Reeded Edge was meant to change the edge on TALs that were being considered for Large Cent stock?The Mint had purchased 1/2 ton of them, and they were already being cut down for Half Cent use https://coins.ha.com/itm/large-cent...ption-071515
Edited by Oldgrouchyguy 07/02/2024 12:24 am
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,544 |
|