Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2000 (P) Memorial Cent - How To Classify These 2 Different Lincoln Memorial Cents

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 511Next Topic  
New Member
grissinb's Avatar
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2025  1:51 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add grissinb to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year / Mintmark / Denomination to Title. It's essential to have it in the title. ***

Please see the two attached pics. The obverse are both 2000 Lincoln Memorial (Philly) nothing particularly special or different between them or other 2000 P memorial cents. The reverse of these coins are what I have shared in the pics. Focus on the A and M and see one cent has the AM visibly separate and someone labeled this holder as a Wide AM. The other pic shows the AM literally touching each other and was labeled Close AM. The Close AM reverse also shows some doubling throughout the reverse of the coin. I could really use some help ID'ing these, and if they are error coins or not, or if they are properly labeled with the correct error. Thanks for any inputs or knowledge
VR
Ben
2000-P-Memorial-Cent---How-To-Classify-These-2-Different-Lincoln-Memorial-Cents
2000-P-Memorial-Cent---How-To-Classify-These-2-Different-Lincoln-Memorial-Cents
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8733 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2025  2:03 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


If both are 2000 P coins, then yes the top coin is a WAM and the second coin is a CAM. The WAM is a minor transitional variety and worth a few dollars. On the second coin, I see Machine Doubling, which is a worthless and common doubling.

LINK for the WAM https://lincolncentresource.com/wideams.html
-makecents-
New Member
grissinb's Avatar
United States
17 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2025  2:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add grissinb to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
ty -makecents- for the input and links. Much appreciated
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
73794 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2025  2:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Makecents nailed it. Nice Wide AM.
Errers and Varietys.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 01/08/2025  2:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice pair!



to the CCF!
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94992 Posts
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 511Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums