| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,110 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
71 Posts |
I've probably owned this mint set for a long time but sometimes you just take a closer look and "bam", there it is - a Denver mint set with all coins displaying their mint mark - except the penny? I can not find any other example of this. Most articles refer 1971 no mint mark to the Philadelphia penny. Again, I'm still new to coin collecting, so is this a common find? What affect on value? I've left it in it's original mint packaging. Photos added for your opinions. Thanks in advance. 
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73812 Posts |
Lincoln cents that didn't have mint marks are from Philadelphia. Only the 2017 Shield Cents had a P mint mark. If the rest of the coins are from Denver, then it's probably a packaging error.
Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys 01/10/2025 12:23 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95088 Posts |
when I get home, I'll check out my Denver set to see if it is the same..
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187862 Posts |
Quote: If the rest of the coins are from Denver, then it's probably a packaging error. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
i seem to recall reading of these before.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1791 Posts |
I do believe although I cannot confirm that coin sets put out by the government are packaged at a central location. It would make sense with all the different sets they put out rather than having equipment for it at every mint. After all, the government wouldn't waste our money would it? 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95088 Posts |
Well, mine has the '71-D cent in it..
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
71 Posts |
Thanks to everyone for your comments. And the packaging error does make sense. BUT - please - someone out there please explain to me why this same, simple logic did not apply to the Great Collections auction 4 months ago that sold a no mint mark dime for half a million dollars!!! Here's the way I saw it - It was a 1975 dime in a proof set of 1976 mint marked coins. Wrong year and no "S" mint mark? Would that not add up to packaging error?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187862 Posts |
That was a proof dime missing the S mint mark. Philly did not mint proof dimes that year, so it was a San Francisco minted dime missing its mint mark.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4589 Posts |
Because the missing S was a genuine error, not a packaging error.
The coin was MINTED without the mintmark because it was left off the die.
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sorry, jackson. 
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
71 Posts |
: Quote: "That was a proof dime missing the S mint mark. Philly did not mint proof dimes that year, so it was a San Francisco minted dime missing its mint mark." I hate to dwell on this, but one last point. What am I missing that I can't wrap my head around this? If there is no mint mark, why do you still say it was a San Francisco minted dime? Why can't it be a Philly dime from 1975 (hence no mint mark) that was slipped in as a packaging error, if there is a central packing centre where coins of different mints are assembled and packaged as has been previously suggested? If it was a 1975 SF minted dime without a mint mark, why a whole year's date difference? It would have had to be a 1975 SF dime minted the whole year prior missing it's mint mark that somehow a year later was included into a 1976 proof set. I can accept missing it's mint mark, but totally different year productions also? What are the odds?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1791 Posts |
The difference is proof and business strike. Uncirculated sets like yours are business strike. Right now in an auction, I viewed a 1971 Philly uncirculated set that had the Philly coins but a D cent in place of the Philly Mint medallion. I also viewed 1968 uncirculated sets where the Half was only in the Denver Mint set and the Philly had a D cent in its place. I have seen other sets where a coin was "substituted" from the other mint. It appears to be somewhat common in the uncirculated sets.
Proof sets that only have coins from a single mint makes it different. If they have to "substitute" a coin because they were short, it would have to be from a different year.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
120 Posts |
I think OP is referring to info I feel like I recall in the 60s part of 70s and part of early 80s maybe, Government put out sets that came in envelopes with both blue P coins and Red D coins, I had a few 70, 71, 72 sets. https://www.collectorsalliance.com/...t-p/4490.htmBlue package p sets came with a Philadelphia business strike and a San Francisco business strike. https://www.collectorsalliance.com/...t-p/7260.htmThe Philadelphia Mint produced proof sets for the United States from 1936 to 1964. In 1968, the Philadelphia Mint stopped producing proof coins and they began to be produced in San Francisco https://www.usmint.gov/learn/collec...s/mint-marksNow with that being said, I think OP is wondering how exactly was the process done? I've heard coins would be shipped then packaged at one location, but recently I have not found that to be answered at all on any Gov stuff. Everytime it's brought up, is about that it was done, and not how it was done. Cheers
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10492 Posts |
Interesting how that could happen, 
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,110 |
|