Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1878 Shield Nickel Proof - For Grading

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 928Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3644 Posts
 Posted 04/12/2025  12:01 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This proof-only date coin is from a partial 1878 proof set that I acquired way back in the day. The rest of the coins were sold some time back. When I bought them, the coins had not been stored in ideal conditions, though they have lived lives of comfort since then. Frankly, I forgot I had these.

I'm concerned about the obverse and reverse carbon spots on this one. I'd welcome all thoughts and opinions. I have additional detailed photos, if needed.

Thanks!

1878-Shield-Nickel-Proof---For-Grading
1878-Shield-Nickel-Proof---For-Grading
Bedrock of the Community
numismatic student's Avatar
United States
11884 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2025  6:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismatic student to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PR65. I don't think the carbon spots affect the grade but do affect the eye appeal and value.
IN NECESSARIIS UNITAS - IN DUBIIS LIBERTAS - IN OMNIBUS CARITAS
THE MAN IN THE ARENA, Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne Paris on April 23, 1910: "It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat."
My coin website:https://fairfaxcoins.com
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3644 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2025  6:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


The carbon spots are in bad locations, too. There are quite a few beautiful examples of this date, and this definitely isn't one of them. The proofs from this era have taken a beating on the market recently, too. There just aren't that many collectors looking for the proofs.
Pillar of the Community
jacrispies's Avatar
United States
3848 Posts
 Posted 04/17/2025  1:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jacrispies to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Can't visualize any contact marks or hairlines on this coin. But I would estimate at MS-64 or 65.
Suffering from bust half fever.
Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955
Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18663 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2025  10:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
FC are these scans? the reason I ask is that these are really tough to determine surfaces and what the coin actually looks like in hand. NS is correct about the carbon spots. I have a few coins graded by PCGS that have a couple small carbon spots and still pulled a 65. I'm thinking so long as they are not all over the coin which would reduce eye appeal they overlook them.

without seeing the actual surfaces PF64 or 65. I'm leaning 64 only because of the weak leaves on the upper 1/4 of the obv
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3644 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2025  1:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
These aren't scans. They are USB scope photos, using indirect lighting. The surface is milky, with a film of some type in areas.

There is luster, but it is subdued. The devices have some frost, especially on the reverse, but nowhere near enough to have a discussion about a CAM. The obverse has a bit of golden toning, but the reverse is gray and lifeless.

They were stored in a leather coin purse for probably close to 100 years. The coins apparently had been wrapped in cotton, but not well enough to keep them from the effects of the tanned leather. The Twenty Cent from this set was a beauty, though. These three are essentially freebies, because the entire deal was about flipping the Twenty Cent.

I agree. They will take a hard knock on value.
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 928Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to rattle this change. Forums