| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,688 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
Just wondering what you all would grade this  Image:  911222.jpg44.97 KB |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1079 Posts |
Going by the picture I would say gEF. All depending on how it looks in the hand it could even be aUNC.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
151 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4589 Posts |
B12 do you work for a garding service hopefullyyyyyyy LOL I think its unc but I am using american grading standards.. and the photo is a scan so it doesn't show you the luster or better details but thank you all on your opionions
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
309 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
I accept everyones opinions..Thank you!!! but now I am curious to why yo garde it as you did ? Its for checks and balances with my garding ability I do believe it is unc however I am curious to learn
Edited by scoutjim99
05/13/2006 11:59 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1079 Posts |
Jim,
For me,I can not grade an UNC unlesss I see it in my hands as pictures are decieving.
Your coin could quite easily be UNC.
Cheers,
Lars
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
thats cool good policy realy and appreciate the honesty.. go look in the central trade thread...
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
309 Posts |
Jim,
the dark spot in the tail on the foto, as well as the coloring in the wapon on the other side makes it not UNC, depending what causes the coloring and the dark spot, it will end up into VF/XF, but I have to see the coin in the hand to tell you exactly what grade it would be.
Remember that we have here on the continent differend type's of grading than you have in the states, I will look if I can find you a goob that shows it exactly, I have one, but need that myself, but I can check what I have upstairs in the athic for double books
Carl
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
2078 Posts |
The answer from my friend who undergraded all coins he ever submitted to TPG's This confirms what was my opinion since I am only his humble student Definitely -- MS63 probably but difficult to tell when silver frosts over that thick.
Makes them look nicer (to me at least) and you can always tell if there are any
major disruptions (I see no trace of any major problems whatsoever) so it's only
the pre-toned fingering that doesn't show and often even in hand you can't tell
unless you degrime them. I only had one bad experience with a coin that looked
like that -- it was brushed and had such a thick white frost layer on it that even
in hand I was unable to tell until I degrimed it (which I shouldn't have done any-
way). If I'd checked it with a loupe I probably would have been able to see it
but since I didn't check that way I'll never know. Anyway, this is one I'd prob-
ably be willing to bank on at least MS63 if I were looking for one like it. Could
be 64 even but these flat designs frankly tend to get a pretty wide range (MS62
to MS64 for example) depending on the grader.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
All great points Thank you, Coin in hand By usa standards I would say the same as ageka however I have heard that the grading is different from country to country which is the reason for the post .. I greatly Appreciate all comments..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
I have had some people look at this one coin in hand and I have heard such varying degrees of opioions .. So I was trying to see what anyone else thinks
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,688 |
|
911222.jpg
Posted 05/13/2006 11:09 am
