Twangator - The coin looks real based on the design. The letters are correct and the coin certainly appears "struck". But I have a couple of concerns about the coin. First it is heavy - the coin has a standard weight of 1.69 grams so 1.8 g is quite high. If the weight is accurate - it could be a problem.
It would appear that the coin may have been mounted at the top center (see depression above King's head). It is not a rare coin so the use of a real coin as jewelry would not be out of the question.
I am also bothered by the porous appearance of the fields of the coin (on the reverse) which could indicate a cast copy. It could be simple damage from being worn as jewelry as well. It needs to be checked.
There are a few anomalies in the design - bump on the King's chin, the bump on the period before the date and the rough edges along the links - all could be due to casting OR damage as jewelry.
The edge design is correct but I am bothered by the apparent "lump" in one of the diagonal groves - above the period between the are and 8 (in the date).
As I said, the coin is a common date so a cast forgery in high grade gold is unlikely as a "Numismatic Forgery". The half and One escudo denominations were popular in jewelry in the 1960s and gold was inexpensive - so anything could be possible. But in addition to gold versions there are also plated base metal copies around.
You should do a specific gravity to be sure you have real gold and then perform a microscopic examination of the coin itself to look for evidence of casting.
It would appear that the coin may have been mounted at the top center (see depression above King's head). It is not a rare coin so the use of a real coin as jewelry would not be out of the question.
I am also bothered by the porous appearance of the fields of the coin (on the reverse) which could indicate a cast copy. It could be simple damage from being worn as jewelry as well. It needs to be checked.
There are a few anomalies in the design - bump on the King's chin, the bump on the period before the date and the rough edges along the links - all could be due to casting OR damage as jewelry.
The edge design is correct but I am bothered by the apparent "lump" in one of the diagonal groves - above the period between the are and 8 (in the date).
As I said, the coin is a common date so a cast forgery in high grade gold is unlikely as a "Numismatic Forgery". The half and One escudo denominations were popular in jewelry in the 1960s and gold was inexpensive - so anything could be possible. But in addition to gold versions there are also plated base metal copies around.
You should do a specific gravity to be sure you have real gold and then perform a microscopic examination of the coin itself to look for evidence of casting.
























