Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Science Or Opinion

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,171Next Topic
Page: of 2
Bedrock of the Community
Bryan1315's Avatar
United States
14454 Posts
 Posted 02/17/2010  10:02 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bryan1315 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think if everyone would watch the video by Jeff Oxman and Ashe Harrison here they would understand its allot more than just an opinion, there is a definite science to VAM's http://www.coincommunity.info/video...xpo-02-2010/ and it also kind of goes along with what I was saying if someone wants to create their own numbering system they can but they wouldn't be able to call it a VAM
Pillar of the Community
aladinslamp's Avatar
United States
3076 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2010  12:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add aladinslamp to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I watched the video it was good, but for the hobby of collecting coins in general, ERROR coins have been known for YEARS....Despite who's name you give them...They encompass all types, pennies to what ever..even to World coins.......As far as VAM's are concerned If LVA died tomarrow
the interest will not go away.....His work is an extention(Might I say A MIGHTY extention} of those who were before him....eventually IMO those that follow him will carry on in his foot steps as the road is well established...there's no need to lock up the VAM as some have mentioned...but to carry it forward.......Vams are now ingrained into the TPG's that's not going to change...with the dilligence (sorry I'm not a secretary and can't spell)of those who follow Vamming will only continue into the future.......and despite some of the issues of numbering systems and other info.....Its not like no one knows about them and it will be worked out......there will be no scrapping and re-inventing of the wheel...it rolls just fine and as every thing in life has...there's always a few bumps in the road...
Bedrock of the Community
Bryan1315's Avatar
United States
14454 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2010  07:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bryan1315 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I believe "extension" is a key word here. I didn't say it would die with him but I am saying I don't think it would ever be accepted if someone redid his whole works and say like called a VAM-44 a VAM-1 I mean its just not going to happen. Another thing if the same die pair was used as a VAM-44 there is no other thing it can be but a VAM-44 with a letter behind it no matter what die stage its at. Sure there may be another die pair that they do not have covered and when that happens well you just go up another number from the last one they found but no way to say this is the same die pair but just becuse this is a earlier or later stage it should be called a different number than the rest with the same pairing
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2010  3:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It IS possible for another researcher to come along, write a new book, renumber a series and have it accepted and replace the previous system. It has happened many times in the past with many series. But usually it happens when there is either a good reason for the change such as a provable major correction in the emission sequence, or a more logical system of arranging the varieties, or if the standard reference for a series is just plain unobtainable for the average collector. Usually though a group of collectos simply "takes over" and verifies new discoveries and assigns a new number in the system used by the author of the standard reference. This is why even though Newcomb dies in 1944, new middle and late date large cent are still assigned Newcomb numbers, and new early halves get Overton numbers, new Conder tokens get D&H numbers etc. Until someone writes a much better book on the Morgan and Peace dollar varieties they will remain VAM varieites.
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,171Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums