Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1809 Silver Spanish Doubloon ( Large Dollar Size)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 14,451Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Indian1's Avatar
United States
3640 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2010  1:34 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Indian1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Would anyone have a pic. of this coin ?

Thanks
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2010  2:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi - in 1809 - the dollar sized silver coin was an 8 Reales. The doubloon is a gold denomination.

The year 1809 is a transitional year between Kings Charles IV and Ferdinand VII. In 1809 there was no standardized portrait for the new king. It is really dependent on which mint you are talking about. Bolivia uses the correct portrait in 1809 but Chile does not. Chile uses an interesting imaginary portrait with a military bust. Columbia used the Charles IV portrait but changed the legends on issues dated to 1820 to read Ferdin VII (they issued no 1809 coin). Guatemala uses the Charles IV portrait with Ferdin VII legend from 1808 to 1810. Mexico uses an imaginary head from 1808 to 1811 - it does not look like the Chile head at all. Peru uses two different imaginary heads which are very odd and crude looking. The first version has a large round swollen head 1808 and 1809 which is reduced in size on the second issue 1809 to 1811. Spain uses a few different protraits for 1809 including the issue of Joseph Napoleon.

So to make a quick reply to your question? There is no single answer - there are MANY.

What mint mark are you interested in?
Pillar of the Community
Indian1's Avatar
United States
3640 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2010  2:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Indian1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Bob

How's things ? I got a call from someone wanting to sell this coin.
I have not seen it yet so I will have to get some more info on it
first. I will answer later with any details I can get.
Thanks
Pillar of the Community
Indian1's Avatar
United States
3640 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2010  2:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Indian1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
First off, 1804 not 09
Obv. carolus IIII, facing right, crown above 8 in date, dei gratia
Rev. pillars, shield, castle, lions, hispan et ind rex M rth
crown above M
Hope this helps. Slight wear only described. Seems authentic.
Normal diameter for an 8 reales. Would say 40 MM (slighty larger than morgan etc.)
Thanks
Pillar of the Community
turtleoverhead's Avatar
Australia
585 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2010  3:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add turtleoverhead to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just go to Google > Images > 8 Reales 1804
Pillar of the Community
Archraz's Avatar
United States
3499 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2010  7:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Archraz to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Indian1- Keep in mind that 8 Reales are counterfeited heavily, so you really are going to have to weigh the coin and have it in hand in order to determine authenticity.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/15/2010  11:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
When reviewing the coin in hand remember a few key facts:

1. Weight is 27.0 grams - wear will not really account for too much loss. Most people over-estimate the weight lost. Be suspicious of any coin in VF or better that weighs less than 26.6 grams. The majority will be forgeries at that weight or less. The correct weight should be 26.8 grams for VF.

2. The edge design is critical especially for Mexico City examples. There are full weight silver forgeries that date to the 1890s, so be careful. A real 8R has TWO areas of overlap on the edge. These 2 overlaps are exactly opposite one another and they are the same length.

3. The circles and Rectangles on Mo9 mint issues are well formed - irregular shapes - square cornered circles - variations in spacing are all signs of likely forgery.

4. The edger apparatus in Mexico City was equipped with dies that had retainer lips that PREVENTED rapid side to side wobble. The edge design should run straight and evenly around the edge.

5. Counterfeits have irregular edges - the full weight silver forgeries often have ONE edge overlap. They sometimes have distinctive grip marks - diagonal slashes that are visible on top of the design on HALF of the edge. /////// I believe these are traces of the mechanism the forgers used to edge their planchets.

6. The forged dies are often made with softer steel and are prone to surface degradation (lumps and bumps in the fields). Be suspicious if there are too many raised lumps.

7. Off metal copies especially those made in Birmingham, England from 1796 to about 1800 used well engraved dies and the coins were Sheffield Plate. These are detectable by Specific Gravity testing only (unless you want to cut the coin ).

8. Modern Chinese copies are usually rather obvious in person. They have awful fields with numerous raised scratches from tooling the die surfaces. These forgeries use various transfer techniques to make most dies but all suffer from a loss of fine detail and a lack of sharpness at the transitions.

9. There are then the obvious types where the design elements are wrong - a comparison of details will give you what you need to do this check.

Once a forgery is detected - the next step is to determine if it is junk or not. The Sheffield Plate Birmingham counterfeits for example are far rarer than originals and they bring high prices. The 1890's silver forgeries are treated as ORIGINALS by most dealers since they can't distinguish the type.

Old crude off metal forgeries made with hand engraved dies are often very collectible. Modern nickel or steel copies with REEDED edges are absolutely WORTHLESS.
Pillar of the Community
Archraz's Avatar
United States
3499 Posts
 Posted 02/15/2010  11:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Archraz to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Indian1- I totally agree with swamperbob. Be very careful when analyzing this coin. Colonial 8's are absolutely wonderful coins, but they are a dangerous game to play.
Pillar of the Community
Indian1's Avatar
United States
3640 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2010  09:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Indian1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks all for the great info.
I did find it. Km-109
If I buy it I will post some pics. etc.
Only odd thing is the guy who has it says there is a crown
or mark above the 8 in the date. Did not see any on the pics. I saw
online.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2010  11:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sounds interesting - I can think of 2 simple answers to the crown at the 8 reference.

That could possibly be a reference to determine the die orientation. The crown above the 8 would be indicative of a 170 degree rotation. The crown correctly oriented is over the furthest laurel leaf to the left on the King's head. Rotations of this magnitude are not common. Late forgeries often use the wrong orientation - coin instead of medallic.

Another possibility is that he is referring to some sort of chop mark or counterpunch. Crowns were used in several cases to confirm the value of Trade dollars.

Let us know what it is.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/16/2010  12:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
One other thought that just hit me. There is a common countermark from the Azores that is a simple crown. See Azores in Krause - Decree of June 14, 1871. My version of Krause does not list this as being used on a Mexican 8R without the initials GP below (which is the second countermark - Decree March 31, 1887). However, I would suspect the earlier countermark did occur on Trade dollars (because the MTT was known to have been counterstamped.)

If this coin does have the Crown c/s - be even more careful that the coin is NOT a modern forgery. The Azores c/s coins are a common target of forgers and they are even seen on poorly done Modern Chinese Dollar sized coins.
Pillar of the Community
Indian1's Avatar
United States
3640 Posts
 Posted 02/17/2010  10:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Indian1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks again Bob. Will do.
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 14,451Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.32 seconds to rattle this change. Forums