| Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,877 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1551 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
133 Posts |
With the neck clashes by the N of IN, there is no way you can have the E that far out of position. One thing you didn't show us is a picture of the date to prove your LDS theory. Most of what you showed us, are pictures of a VAM 1C that look like they came straight out of VAMWORLD, plus a couple of pics of PMD below the tailfeathers. Sorry, but no cigar.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1551 Posts |
I will post the full coin as well as the date,cap dot. . I took them last night (they are my photos.)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Great shots. What equipment are you using?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1551 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
133 Posts |
I must admit that I have never looked at a VAM 1C in my hand, but I do own an attributed 1B. Even tho Leroy list them as having the same die pairing, we might be looking at a die 1 or die 2 thing here. I have die cracks where you don't have die cracks and you have die cracks where I don't have die cracks and die cracks are like finger prints. That tells me that your coin was not struck with the same exact dies that mine was struck with therefore there can't be any of that EDS or LDS talk. Hope this makes sense to you and you do take nice pictures.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1551 Posts |
LVA has been mistaken once or twice I saw him in Jan. going over 1884 cc VAM 3b,c,d, and what may become (e). As well as a 1884 cc Vam-10 with a dash Or sould I say a Vam-9's Obverse Dash and die with the wrong Reverse. It has the Vam-10's reverse doubled motto. His listing shows only one reverse. I am looking for a true Vam-9 1884 cc to compare it to, so LVA can update the listing.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
133 Posts |
A lot of vams are listed with the same die pairings which doesn't mean anything is wrong or a mistake in the big book was made. We have a fairly good idea of how many die pairings have been used or were available to use, but we're not quite sure of just how many dies were made and in what order they were made off of the master hub and working hubs and then the dies sent to the different mints. IMO what we have tried to do is use rocket science technology to the mint workers who were only concerned about making production quotas. What does get my attention about this post tho, is your sudden switch from a 1887-P to a 1884-CC. Just what is it that your trying to prove?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1551 Posts |
I'm not trying to prove anything. If you have the one mentioned I would love to see picks. LVA thinks the listing of the Vam-9 may be in error. We sat down with the one I have it's a Vam-10 reverse die with a Vam-9 obverse. The reverse die's are very different. We are trying to fix the listing error or prove that there are (2) different dashed type in this year. That is all.
I was just hoping you may have one, (fishing) I have looked at about 30 of them (that year) and have not found one to compare it to.
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,877 |
|