Troy, There is no such variety. I'm almost as new here as you are but I find your posts have contributed very little value to any discussion.
First off, your 15 average posts per day on a forum that only averages about 8 posts per day just screams you're spamming. A look at your posts confirms it:
* On a topic about 2010 magnetic/nonmagnetic cents, you give an opinion of mint yearly losses on cent coin productions.
* On a topic about 2006 cent varieties, you made 2 posts 2 minutes apart, rather than editing the initial post. One post answered a question that had been answered to satisfaction a month and a half earlier.
* On a topic discussing whether a particular nickel was an error or man made, you posted twice within 5 minutes, both of which broke site rules and were edited by staff.
* On a topic asking for pictures between dime varieties of a certain year, your only contribution is that you spent one.
* On a topic discussing the legitimacy of an "11 cent coin", your only contribution is to say you've "seen one before".
And the one that takes the cake:
* On a topic about coin errors, you accused someone of theft from a government institution.
I'm sorry to say this, and I'm sorry to windychimes for having to post this here in this thread, but I think it needs to be said to avoid the degradation of the quality of this forum. I hope you see this message in the way in which it is intended - written as constructive criticism in order to help maximize the enjoyment of everyone who uses this forum. It's a great place to learn and to share your knowledge with others.
So that said, welcome to the forum and I hope it turns out to be a positive experience for you!
First off, your 15 average posts per day on a forum that only averages about 8 posts per day just screams you're spamming. A look at your posts confirms it:
* On a topic about 2010 magnetic/nonmagnetic cents, you give an opinion of mint yearly losses on cent coin productions.
* On a topic about 2006 cent varieties, you made 2 posts 2 minutes apart, rather than editing the initial post. One post answered a question that had been answered to satisfaction a month and a half earlier.
* On a topic discussing whether a particular nickel was an error or man made, you posted twice within 5 minutes, both of which broke site rules and were edited by staff.
* On a topic asking for pictures between dime varieties of a certain year, your only contribution is that you spent one.
* On a topic discussing the legitimacy of an "11 cent coin", your only contribution is to say you've "seen one before".
And the one that takes the cake:
* On a topic about coin errors, you accused someone of theft from a government institution.
I'm sorry to say this, and I'm sorry to windychimes for having to post this here in this thread, but I think it needs to be said to avoid the degradation of the quality of this forum. I hope you see this message in the way in which it is intended - written as constructive criticism in order to help maximize the enjoyment of everyone who uses this forum. It's a great place to learn and to share your knowledge with others.
So that said, welcome to the forum and I hope it turns out to be a positive experience for you!




















