Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1947 Half Dollars Rare Or Common?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 2,211Next Topic  
Valued Member
Stunet's Avatar
United States
211 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2010  7:47 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Stunet to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
These are details from two half dollars. I am wondering if either of these are valuable enough to have them graded? I don't like to grade coins worth less than $200.

Both are straight 7's, one has a Maple Leaf.

1947-Half-Dollars-Rare-Or-Common?

1947-Half-Dollars-Rare-Or-Common?
Pillar of the Community
Canada
693 Posts
 Posted 06/21/2010  08:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinsrfun to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To answer your question, a grade would need be assigned which is impossible with part pics. Check both 7's in your pictures. A matched pair. Except one was punched in 48.
Valued Member
malibu's Avatar
Canada
304 Posts
 Posted 06/21/2010  11:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add malibu to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good pics!

The first one looks harshly cleaned, or are the scratches on the holder? The 47 is not so rare, 424,885 minted (all varieties combined).

The 47 ML S7 is rare, 38,433 minted, about the same as 1948. But it probably wont grade over EF40, i.e. way under your $200 limit.
Valued Member
Stunet's Avatar
United States
211 Posts
 Posted 06/21/2010  12:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Stunet to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Check both 7's in your pictures. A matched pair. Except one was punched in 48.


One of the 7's looks double punched. What do you mean it was punched in 1948?

I think you are right about the cleaning. When I look at it with the loupe I can't see those polishing scratches, but they show up in the photo really clearly. The obverse in the photo is clearly cleaned - with my loupe I can only discern some scratches under George's chin. Is there a trick to using the loupe to see scratches?

Note on the photography: I am using a Canon XSI with a stock 18-55 lens and a 10+ diopter. Fluorescent Photo lights.

1947-Half-Dollars-Rare-Or-Common?



1947-Half-Dollars-Rare-Or-Common?
Pillar of the Community
Canada
693 Posts
 Posted 06/21/2010  1:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinsrfun to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Both the 7's are doubled. The ML coin was made in 1948.
Valued Member
Canada
456 Posts
 Posted 06/22/2010  09:06 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pginrh to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The legend "ET IND IMP" was removed from all 1948 Canadian Coins. The Dies were late shipping from England and they used 1947 Dies with a Maple Leaf added for the coins produced in 1948 until the true 1948 Dies arrived from England.
Valued Member
malibu's Avatar
Canada
304 Posts
 Posted 06/26/2010  6:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add malibu to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Is there a trick to using the loupe to see scratches?


is the camera focusing on the holder or the coin? If you dont see the scratches on the coin, they must be on the holder.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts
 Posted 06/26/2010  9:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hhbkiddo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Camera lens does not lie. With a macro lens, it sees things which you do not want to be there, or do NOT want to see at all. BUT they are there.I use also a Cannon rebel, but with a 90mm Tamron Macro.
well worth it. Camera is mounted on an old enlarger stand. Light source is a 60 watt incandescent lamp. method use is to 90% axial lighting.
Valued Member
Stunet's Avatar
United States
211 Posts
 Posted 06/26/2010  10:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Stunet to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There is no holder. The coin is shot naked to the camera. Those scratches are on the coin. They are more apparent on the obverse of both coins.
Interestingly the straight 7 has no scratches on the reverse. The scratches on the maple leaf reverse are only on the interior field. (see above picture). Might be die polishing.

hhbkiddo - What do you mean by 90% axial lighting?
I have two lights with the source coming from 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock. I play with both of them for the optimal effect. Both lights together give the coin a gloss. I use only one light if I want to emphasis subtle scratches or interesting strikes.
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 2,211Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums