| Author |
 Replies: 27 / Views: 3,672 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189596 Posts |
I am thinking 1927. I am not seeing enough evidence to indicate that a '9' dipped down below the bottom of the '2'.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Looks to me, you can see the curve of the "9"
I'll say it's a '29
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1729 Posts |
And I say it's time for another closeup photo with light slanting across the numerals. Maybe more than one. When I looked at it today, it actually looked like a "2"!
Edited by pls
07/01/2010 5:29 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
189596 Posts |
To me it only looks like a '2' because I want it to be a '2'.  So, after the three hours plus since my last examination, I now find that I am seeing what could be an '8'!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
After playing with the pic, its definitely a 1929, it shows up much better after adjusting the satuation and color to set the image off from the faded number.
|
|
Moderator
United States
189596 Posts |
Quote:
..after adjusting the satuation and color to set the image off from the faded number. I think you are right, but after doing all that I now see a '3'. That's right, a '3'. I officially give up!  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1729 Posts |
Today it looks like a '27.
Tomorrow, after certain holiday libations, it'll probably look like a 727 going in for a crash landing ... I'll let you know.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts |
Nice find! That's the 1922-D No D No 2! I'll call it a '23... |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1729 Posts |
1927
And that's my FINAL answer!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1213 Posts |
It's old, and it's a 192something. I'd go w/ 1929.
|
|
New Member
United States
35 Posts |
When I lower my head so my screen is above me, I can actually make out the loop of the 9. I believe it's a 29
|
| |
Replies: 27 / Views: 3,672 |
First Page
Posted 07/01/2010 3:32 pm
