Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2005 ASE Gem Uncirculated

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 2,025Next Topic  
Valued Member
rastatodd's Avatar
United States
487 Posts
 Posted 07/28/2010  10:25 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add rastatodd to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I just purchased a 2005 ASE in a PCGS holder with the inscription "2005 Silver Eagle - Gem Brilliant Uncirculated". This holder has no verification code number, or bar code on the label. Never seen this before. Can anybody tell me the story behind this?
Pillar of the Community
afclassic87's Avatar
United States
564 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2010  12:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add afclassic87 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Can you post a picture? I know the older slabs almost look like they are fake. A picture would help!
Valued Member
rastatodd's Avatar
United States
487 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2010  06:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rastatodd to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Will post picture tonight. I hope you can shed so light on this coin!
Pillar of the Community
Indian1's Avatar
United States
3640 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2010  09:36 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Indian1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
At times grading companies get orders to slab many coins quickly.
Instead of grading each one exactly they give a ballpark grade term.
Starting at the low end they should be:
Unc. - ms-60 thru 62
BU (brilliant unc.)- ms63/64
Gem unc. - ms65/66
Choice unc. - ms67/69
Perfect unc. - ms70

Gem BU
Choice gem unc.
These terms should not be used as they are confusing.



Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2010  1:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Such a slab can come about for three reason. One they tended to us such a label on the give-a-way slabs they use to hand out to their paid collectors club members, but that probably isn't the case because I think they all mention the collectors club and you didn't mention that.

Two, slabs that were submitted as part of a big promotion by the TV coin shows would often be slabbed without a numeric grade as long as they were uncirculated.

Three, dealers who make large bulk submissions have the option of specifying a minimum grade. Any piece not reaching that grade would be slabbed in one of these non-numeric grade holders. The percentage of coins that reached the specified minimum grade would deternine how much they paid per coin for the grading. If the percentage achieved was high enough they could even get the non-numerics back at no charge.
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 2,025Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums