Posted 09/14/2010 01:56 am
I notice that the '18' in the date 1825 is lower that the '25', and is the same as illustrated in Coincraft's Catalogue. If that is a variety, it may be the most common variety for that date. I may stand to be corrected on this point.
Considering the excellent condition of the piece, one wonders if it may have been struck as a proof, although Coincraft does not list an 1825 proof in copper, only gold.
Considering the excellent condition of the piece, one wonders if it may have been struck as a proof, although Coincraft does not list an 1825 proof in copper, only gold.
