Quote:
but will say that I've seen many higher grade (usually 66) MS coins with this type of toning. I've also photographed this type of toning. If you've ever taken photographs of coins from this era with similar toning you know what you're looking at here. The olive you see in the photo is a bright chartreuse green in hand. What looks like a copper hue in the photo, is probably bright red. My point is that photos can be misleading. I'm not defending this coin, or suggesting that I particularly care for this toning, but am surprised so many of you absolutely detest it and oppose the grade assuming it isn't worn.

Lukkyseven, you need to keep in mind that the images are digital, not guaranteed to be an accurate representation of the coin in hand. I'm sure in hand that isn't actually wear, and to be honest I have enough faith in the expert graders at NGC to assume that they know what they're doing and don't blatantly give circulated coins MS grades. Toners are notoriously difficult to image and I'm sure in hand the coin is different than the image implies.
Edited by wheatguy
11/13/2010 3:56 pm