| Author |
 Replies: 6 / Views: 3,018 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
465 Posts |
After weeks of searching and finding 0,nothing,my hands me the change from her purse after hearing my frustration,,the first thing I saw stuck out clear,,,the scans are bad,,this is PMD?my real question is about a flame error that I have heard about?A 6 flame or something of that type,,anyone have a clue what I am jabbering about,,    |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
366 Posts |
Can't be certain from the quality of these pics, but it sure looks like PMD. |
|
Valued Member
 United States
465 Posts |
ME to,,I am really more intersted about the flame error,,if there is one,,thanks alot for looking,,
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4000 Posts |
No, don't know what you're jabbering about. LOL!
Unless you're referring to some kind of "fancy name" that someone made up to sell a bunch of gouged, chipped or damaged coins. Did you read this somewhere?
Anyway, looks like just good old damage on this one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Your coin just has a big gouge. I think I know what you are referring to in regard to the flame but it is not an error. There are a few strong DDRs in the Roosy series with prominent doubling on the flame, most obvious in the tips of the flame.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
465 Posts |
Yes I know what I have posted is PMD,,But yes scooby,,I read something somewhere about a extra flame or,,maybe its what biokemist is talking about,,I am going to see if I can find the exact place I read it a few years back,,but I trust what is being said here,,no doubt,,as a matter of fact I think it was counting a doubled flame as a extra flame,,what are the actuall number of flames,are they counted by the tips?thanks |
|
Valued Member
United States
465 Posts |
I found it,,a 1964 example I found when I googled has a extreme doubling on the flame tips,,but is a really cool coin,,biokemist,,many thanks
|
| |
Replies: 6 / Views: 3,018 |
|
Posted 12/28/2010 11:37 pm
