| Author |
Replies: 31 / Views: 4,447 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
311 Posts |
When Canada got rid of the 1 and 2 dollar banknote and forced everyone to use the coins there was resistance. But when the goverment ignored the complainer and people got used to it fast. It was probably for the best. If the U.S. did the same it would probably be received the same way.
Just do it.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1729 Posts |
Ah, well, we all know that common sense departed Washington long ago. But as Redlock pointed out: "In 2002, 12 European countries brought the Euro coins (and bills) into circulation which was a major, big and huge effort -- and happpend with no problems to speak of." I'd love to see such a transformation in this country, with the same increasing, graduated-sized coins (maybe even including a 2ยข coin) with some of the same historic portraits (Lincoln, Jefferson, Washington) on them, using metals or even acrylic that will not soon increase to more than face value of each coin.
So what does it take? A congressman who is an avid coin collector who somehow retained enough common sense to grasp how much money could be saved by conversion? Someone here to crunch some numbers to send to him (or her) to help convince other senators and representatives to co-sponsor the bill? An inspired committee to come up with designs that everyone can live with? I dunno, but just dumping the dollar bill (good idea, that) isn't going to do it.
And while we're at it, let's get some overdue changes with our paper money, too, like getting rid of portraits of alcoholic presidents and duplicates to portraits on coins, and adding Braille dots to make it easier for blind people to dispense money.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
310 Posts |
well, The way to get it done is through congress. they control the mint. So, ya, you gotta get the house and senate behind it. If you use the financial reasons you many have a shot convincing them at the current time when we're in an economic low period. Just tell em, it'll save them money they can use on other useless things lol.
I'd be against a 2 cent coin because of the same reason the penny is in trouble. finding an alloy that you can produce and distribute such a small denomination and still be profitable would be hard. I'd rather just re-alloy the 5 cent piece, and since people love it, save the penny with a re-alloy. 5 cents gives you a bigger margin than 2 cents.
I also agree, just get rid of the $1...yeah there will be resistance and complaining, but when the dollar coin is the only choice, I believe acceptance will come rather quickly. Also we can use the 1.5 billion $2 notes we have now.
We need to start a group to overhaul currency lol.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
311 Posts |
The U.S. and Canada have coinage that is very similar. Even the dollar coins are the same size. In Canada all U.S. coins are freely accepted. It only makes sense that someday dollar coins will be used exclusively. Although the U.S. is the only country I know of that still uses miles. I never understood why? If a city is 500 km it takes 5 hours. If it is 500 miles lets see 500 divided by 60, you can see where I am going.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1729 Posts |
The entire midwest is laid out in mile squares, soccerdad. It's not like Philadelphia or Rochester where you can get lost in three minutes by not being able to tell which direction is which, even if the sun is shining!
Actually, GRR, I'd be in favor of dumping the 1-cent coin and moving up to a 2-center, keeping Lincoln's portrait on it and using bronze-colored acrylic, as Canada did (does?) instead of ugly aluminum.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
310 Posts |
I'm reluctant to let go of the penny, not because of nostalgia, but because it allows us to still deal in the smallest denomination. A dollar is 100 cents, and although it's "just a cent", I'd want to do a cash transaction for say $1.87 , rather than have to round up to $1.88.
I haven't seen any acrylic coinage as of yet, and I have to admit that I would be resistant to pulling metal out of coinage. I guess I'm still a bullion person. Although our money doesn't contain the value of metal we issue our coinage for(except the nickel), our coinage does carry a base bullion value, weather it be Copper, Nickel, Silver, Gold, or whatever. The idea of an Acrylic coin seems like monopoly play money to me.
It is getting harder to come up with an alloy to keep the penny in production though. It's already 97.5% zinc. Aluminum and Zinc are roughly the same price per pound, so I don't see Aluminum being the answer. The production cost would probably be the same as the zinc/copper alloy we currently use. We need some alloy near 50 cents a pound to actually get back to profitability after taking into account production costs, etc.
Oddly enough copper could be viable for the nickel if we cut down the nickel % and thin the coin. That's also supposing that copper doesn't skyrocket in price. production costs for a nickel is around 2.3 cents per coin, so you need an alloy of no more than 2.7 cents per coin. If we say made the nickel half as thick as it is now and make it like 97.5%copper with a nickel shell, we'd have a coin the same weight as a copper zinc penny, same diameter as the current nickel and an alloy price around 2.33 cents per coin, add in production, and you get 4.66 cents roughly total cost. Not great, but still better than the 9.22 cents per nickel it costs us now. If copper we to take off, it would screw that idea.
Aluminum would be a great option at this point for the nickel though. The problem right now isn't so much the copper(although it's recent volatility doesn't help), but Nickel is $12 a pound.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1315 Posts |
Just a thought on Lincolns.
They've been making them (Memorials) by the billions since 1959. Most people just put them in a jar after they get a pocket full.
There has to be a lot of them just sitting around out there. Why doesn't the mint buy them back for say 1.25 cents, or something less than it costs to make one, and roll em up and send them out again?
Meanwhile they could make a new cent with a much lower mintage for a while. The new cent with a low mintage would be great for collectors and the mint could still offer their "specials" selling them for more than they're worth before they enter circulation.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
212 Posts |
Your idea will never work. It's too practical. Remember, the mint is part of the government.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
958 Posts |
if it aint broke dont fix it
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
958 Posts |
at most end 50 cent coins
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
310 Posts |
50 cent coins are profitable, no reason to end them. A redesign to make them more manageable would probably make them useful again.
Only reason the mint makes billions of pennies a year is because of the demand for them. People do hoard them, as well as use them, which is why the production numbers are so high. If people didn't hoard them, the numbers would be lower.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
92 Posts |
Interesting topic with a lot of ideas. I can't say I know much about the metallic content of our coins but I have gotten some State Quarters in change from purchases I've made and even a few Presidential$ and it seems to me they do not hold up well in circulation.I saved the best looking ones,maybe someone in the future might want them for their collection,but most I used to make other purchases. The surface of the coins are discolored,chipped,scratched,or just plain wore off.I've gotten 2009-2010 pennies and I think it's sad to see black spots on them already.Seems to me silver coins lasted in circulations for quite a while until people started collecting.Even the Indians,Lincolns,Buffalo's and Merck's survived feast,famine,war and melt downs. I have not seen a $2 in 20yrs. didn't know if they were printed or not.OK I'll get off my soap box now. gasman96
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: Aluminum and Zinc are roughly the same price per pound, so I don't see Aluminum being the answer. Same price per pound but the lower density of aluminum means that a pound of aluminum has a much greater volume. You can make roughly three times as many cents from a pound of aluminum than you can from a pound of zinc.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188549 Posts |
Quote: When Canada got rid of the 1 and 2 dollar banknote and forced everyone to use the coins there was resistance. But when the goverment ignored the complainer and people got used to it fast. It was probably for the best. If the U.S. did the same it would probably be received the same way.
Just do it.  Quote: hey've been making them (Memorials) by the billions since 1959. Most people just put them in a jar after they get a pocket full... Why doesn't the mint buy them back for say 1.25 cents, or something less than it costs to make one, and roll em up and send them out again? No need to do that. Just stop making them and the people will empty those jars for face value. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
310 Posts |
good point condor101 on the Aluminum. I'm not sure of the durability of pure Aluminum at the same size, or if they would alloy it. If you could truly make 3 pennies out of the same volume of metal, you may be able to keep the copper shell and just replace the zinc core with an aluminum one and regain profitability.
|
| |
Replies: 31 / Views: 4,447 |