Posted 02/09/2011 7:37 pm
The grainy look is the luster. I promise I will get better at photography . . . . .
I hear you about the marks, and they concern me as well. But only about three of them are readily visible. One thing the camera does is catch those marks well.
That ugly one under the ear? It ain't even there! Well, it is actually there, but I would have never seen it if not for the photo.
The two on the cheek is indeed visible, though very light.
Marks in the hairline? Ain't there.
Marks in the right wing? Can't see 'em without magnification.
But the camera doesn't lie, it just exaggerates. :)
Anyway, it is what it is, and no monetary value to speak of. I am just seeking knowledge.
Jon
I hear you about the marks, and they concern me as well. But only about three of them are readily visible. One thing the camera does is catch those marks well.
That ugly one under the ear? It ain't even there! Well, it is actually there, but I would have never seen it if not for the photo.
The two on the cheek is indeed visible, though very light.
Marks in the hairline? Ain't there.
Marks in the right wing? Can't see 'em without magnification.
But the camera doesn't lie, it just exaggerates. :)
Anyway, it is what it is, and no monetary value to speak of. I am just seeking knowledge.
Jon
