| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,360 |
|
|
Valued Member
273 Posts |
Two MADs... worth one cent each (Not MAD enough). (THANKS for looking and I always appreciate the comments). Found them both plus a Buffalo nickel from $5 of change from safeway.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Is you 1998 D MAD also a WAM? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4212 Posts |
I thought just the Philly's were WAM's? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
Quote:I thought just the Philly's were WAM's? WAMS are 1996p, 1998p, 1999p, & 2000p CAMS are 1992p/d, 1998s & 1999s proofs I hope this helps Edited by chris12018
03/12/2011 06:24 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
My bad. I was thinking of the 1992D CAM.  Edited by scurry64
03/11/2011 1:34 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
Actually Chris the 1996 WAM is suspect and is probably a red herring. The supposed Crawford specimen was never verified and has not been seen since his claim. I still look though potential for a WAM exsists on all the post 92 cent. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
Agree with Amida on the 1996...and I think Chris also meant 98-S CAM...not 88
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Okay...back to the actual purpose of this thread...
The two coins posted my be slightly misaligned, but not nearly enough to bring any sort of premium value. Coins with this degree of misalignment are actually quite common.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
I think he knew that Coppercoins. But you're right we should stick to topic. Should probably add IMHO.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
I think he knew that Coppercoins. But you're right we should stick to topic. Should probably add IMHO. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Umm, yeah...maybe I should actually READ what's around the photos next time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
Quote:
and I think Chris also meant 98-S CAM...not 88
Yes a typo |
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,360 |
|
Posted 03/11/2011 11:32 am
