Two questions, not necessarily related:
1. For those that use microscopes for checking VAMs (at least stereoscopic is a given) is one adequate/better than others keeping things around or unbder the $500 mark? Given that 10-30X and 10-40X are about the same price. I would like opinion on sharpness, built-in lighting, etc.
2. Using a tri-scopic is not out of the question, but I see no need to spend $300 for a (Nikon) camera adapter. Am I wrong? Will the scope mounted digi's produce an adequate image for databasing, posting and 1:1 printouts of
VAM attributes? Full coin views will be shot with a 100mm micro.
Thanks for any input,
Seth