Coin Community Family of Web Sites
300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop CCF Members on eBay! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2001-S Sacagawea

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,712Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Ralph's Avatar
United States
1582 Posts
 Posted 10/09/2006  1:16 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Ralph to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I'm looking for opinions on the grade of this Sac. It seems it is the most valuable of the series, and, of course, the higher the grade.....
The coin in hand doesn't have the white specks, so they are from the scanner, not the coin.
I do have one problem with the distraction in the fields. Under magnification they appear to be tiny water spots, or some kind of liquid. Is there a way to clean these coins without disturbing the surface. I've read about cleaning silver coins and copper coins, but nothing about the Sacs. Any help will greatly appreciated. Thanks.



Image: 2001-S-Sacagawea 2001-S Sacagawea.jpg
44.82 KB

Image: 2001-S-Sacagawea 2001-S Sacagawea Rev.jpg
53.4 KB
Pillar of the Community
Ralph's Avatar
United States
1582 Posts
 Posted 10/13/2006  11:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ralph to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Given the value ($100.)of this particular coin in PF-65 ('07 RedBook) I would have thought at least someone would have commented on it, and I'm curious as to why no one has. I'm sure I'm not the only collector here in this forum that has a set.
Is it because the series is still new, and not that many consider it collectable? Or, do you suppose the fact that it is of copper and brass that has kept the interest low - no precious metal-no interest?
I'm aware of the fact that there are many in circulation, and they are easy to obtain in circulated condition, but a complete set in MS and PF is, in my opinion, necessary for my dollar collection.
Also, as I pointed out previously, the spots are still there, and I still would like to know a safe way to remove them without damaging the surface of the coin. Thanks.

Ralph
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 10/13/2006  4:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, let me start by saying that grading a proof requires excellent pics to pick out minute marks or blemishes. Your pictures are kind of pixelated which makes it hard to tell what is on the coin and what is digital noise.

As far as the spots go, I believe that is residue from the planchet wash at the Mint. I have a couple proof Sackies with similar "water spots" but I have no idea how to remove them. The manganese cladding is notorious for toning so I would be afraid of doing much of anything to a proof Sacky.
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,712Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to rattle this change. Forums