Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1908-S IHC - PCGS?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 2,349Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts
 Posted 04/04/2011  6:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eddiespin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I am so on board with this thinking. Grading companies have too much power. Am I just a cynic or does anyone else see a huge opportunity for corruption in the slabbing of coins world. The difference in value between a 66 and a 67 can be thousands of dollars.

I am in no way accusing any company or anyone affiliated with a grading service, I'm just saying people are people (Madoff) and It's just a professional opinion right? A point for a buddy, a point for a buck.

I do see the value of grading services, professionals weeding out fakes, but the whole industry seems to leave a bad taste in my mouth.

Well that was an unusual rant for me, I'll go away now
You talk too much.

J/K! Count me in, too.

Pillar of the Community
ExoGuy's Avatar
United States
4416 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2011  12:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ExoGuy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Eddiespin wrote:
Quote:
ExoGuy, I don't know that I'd characterize that PCGS VG-10 as a "mistake."


Hi eddiespin. I didn't characterize as you say this 1908-S slab as a mistake by PCGS. I simply wrote that this much exalted slabber isn't above making mistakes; citing the wrongly labeled 1909-S slab as an example.

I was recently going through a box of old coins, looking for some to put in an auction. I had long ago marked the 2x2's with my grade. Upon reassessment, I knocked one down a full grade, feeling I had previously made a mistake in judgment on that one. Can it be that the omnipotent, professional graders are above such mistakes?

Some years ago, I sat down with a top grader for ANACS at the FUN Show. I handed him two slabbed 1916-D dimes; one ANACS and one PCGS. Both were graded AG-3. The ANACS coin looked G-4 to me, and every dealer to whom I'd shown that coin agreed. It fit the ANACS G-4 description, perfectly. My question for the grader was, "Could this be reslabbed as a G-4?" He agreed that the ANACS coin was better than that in the PCGS holder; yet, both AG-3. When he said that the ANACS-slabbed dime was an "AG-3.8", I departed. I cracked out the coin and sold it to a dealer for G-4 money; then, over $100 above the AG price.

Making mistakes is human, but arrogant denial is less so, methinks. I'll likely never utilize ANACS services, again.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2011  9:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add just carl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looking at that add I get a little confused. On the lower section they show a coin not in a slab and on the same place a coin in a slab. Is this supposed to be the same coin? Or is it for comparisaon? Or was it supposed to be a photo of the coin before and after it was slabbed. I wonder which you'ld get if you purchased those or it. Regardless of the grade on the slab, is it for the same coin? I keep away from mysteries.
Pillar of the Community
acloco's Avatar
United States
3540 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2011  10:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add acloco to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Agreed that grading is an "opinion". But, I have a problem with the "market grading" concept and practice.

PCGS is making a PROFIT to grade coins. There was a standardized grading system that has been curved as "market grading". This helps PCGS graded coins to command a premium over a similar slabbed coin from another grading service, because of the perceived concept that if the slab is from brand X grading service, then the grade is true.

The PCGS population report used to be a fair guide to measure a particular coins value based on rarity in the grade. Not any more. HUGE premiums are placed on the highest graded coins from that grading service.

So, on one hand, PCGS is to blame. On the other, a category of numismaniacs (no, I did not spell that wrong!) are responsible as well. Call it the competitive nature or not.

Believe that PCGS is the larger entity to blame on the curve of the grading philosophy though. They are bending the grades....the coins don't lie. They are in this for a profit and continue to do so by offering a curved grading service based on standards they are not adherring to.
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 2,349Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to rattle this change. Forums