| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 4,938 |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
114 Posts |
I am posting this under the British section as it relates to British Coins and British Law - or perhaps it might apply further afield.
I am dismayed that the word "melt" (or equivalent) crops up so often in numismatic forums. There are two reasons for this, the first being that even if it has worn to almost a blank disc it is still a coin which might interest someone. The second is the legal aspect for which I quote:-
From the Coinage Act 1971 - Section 10 (1) No person shall, except under the authority of a licence granted by the Treasury, melt down or break up any metal coin which is for the time being current in the United Kingdom or which, having been current there, has at any time after 16th May 1969 ceased to be so. This would apply to any pre-decimal coin which was valid at decimalisation (issued subsequent to the 1816 Act) plus any post-decimalisation coin.
I do not know whether this could be applied to anyone who melts a British coin in another country, but the warning is there. It might also be interesting to look at the laws of other countries.
Bill.
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16873 Posts |
Each country has different laws regarding if and when it is legal to deface, mutilate, melt down or otherwise render unfit for circulation the coinage.
In Britain, as in most monarchies, it has traditionally been seen as a serious offence; I believe it was still considered treason (punishable by death) to deface the king's portrait on a coin until the 1800s. Britain's current law, which you quoted above, is a legacy of those times. Many of the Commonwealth Realms (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc), whose laws are based on British Common Law, have similarly strict anti-melting laws in place.
America, on the other hand, has surprisingly lax laws. Anyone can do whatever they wish to their coins, with no penalty; the only exceptions on the books at the moment are placing advertising stickers on coins and the current ban on melting 1 cent and 5 cent coins.
Laws of one country are completely irrelevant outside that country's borders. Once British coins leave British territory, they are no longer protected by British law. Anyone in America can melt British coins down until the cows come home, with no fears of a knock on the door by MI6 agents. American citizens only have to obey American laws, not British ones, and American laws don't say anything about not melting British coins down. Here in Australia I can even melt down non-Australian coins from other Commonwealth Realms, because there's no Australian law saying I can't. This is the case in every other country, including Britain, I am sure.
Even British citizens can travel to America and melt down British coins there, with no fears of reprisal. If Britain has laws prohibiting you taking British coins with you with the intent to deface them, then you'd better make sure you don't do that; America has such laws in place regarding 1 cent and 5 cent coins, so it wouldn't surprise me. An analogy: many countries in the Middle East have laws against alcohol consumption. Does anyone outside those countries feel compelled to obey their anti-alcohol laws? No. And citizens of those countries can travel abroad and drink as much as they please, without fear of arrest on their return home.
As for your main point, that we as collectors should mourn every time a coin is melted, it is true up to a point. Sure, future generations of collectors are going to curse our bones for allowing all these precious coins to be melted down, but they're not here right now - we are. Protecting the coins that exist today is our responsibility, and if we're serious about it then we've got to put our money where our mouth is. If the collectors of today aren't prepared to pay substantially above bullion value for "melt-grade" coins, then to the melters they will inevitably go. This is the way it has been, ever since coinage was invented.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Valued Member
 United Kingdom
114 Posts |
Thank you Sap for a very interesting reply. Over the centuries, many attempts were made to stop "good British silver" coins being taken abroad because of the value of the silver, which was then debased and returned to Britain as imitations of British coins.
However, I still dislike the way in which some people, who usually tend to be from America, so readily reply on the lines of "OK, thanks, if it's not worth much I'll melt it". This goes against the way in which I was brought up - to treat coins with respect.
Bill.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1143 Posts |
Greshams law at work in numismatics.
|
|
Valued Member
 United Kingdom
114 Posts |
Bad money drives out good.
Greed (for bars of silver?) is one of the seven deadly sins.
Bill.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
296 Posts |
Wanting silver (and gold) is not greed. Not by any stretch of the imagination. It is common sense survival, preserving ones earned wealth. The price of silver and gold are not going up, the buying power of your fiat Federal Reserve Note is going down. It has lost 98% of it's buying power in less than a century, thanks to the Federal Reserve. Ponder that for a moment. For what you could buy a 100 of for X amount of $ in 1913, you can now only buy 2 of with that same X amount of $... Now compare the cost in ounces of silver those items cost, both in 1913 and 2011... I understand your passion for numismatics. I love old coins too. I also love antiques and classic cars. It pains me to see historical objects and vehicles destroyed, but that's life. If you want to direct your anger at anybody, direct it towards your government. They are the ones who debased your dollar so severely that your coinage is worth more as scrap than its stated face value. I just realized I drifted this thread a bit off course, my bad. Sap summed it up basically perfect, can't really add anything. One point he made I feel deserves reiteration... Quote: As for your main point, that we as collectors should mourn every time a coin is melted, it is true up to a point. Sure, future generations of collectors are going to curse our bones for allowing all these precious coins to be melted down, but they're not here right now - we are. Protecting the coins that exist today is our responsibility, and if we're serious about it then we've got to put our money where our mouth is. If the collectors of today aren't prepared to pay substantially above bullion value for "melt-grade" coins, then to the melters they will inevitably go. This is the way it has been, ever since coinage was invented. That said, there is a whole lot more hoarding going on than actual melting right now (that could very well change). The people who are hoarding don't want to exchange their precious metals for fiat paper dollars. That would defeat the purpose of owning precious metals.
|
|
Valued Member
 United Kingdom
114 Posts |
I have no anger, only disappointment at the number of people who "sign up" just to ask how much a coin is worth, say that they will melt it, and then disappear. Other than use for coins, metals such as gold and silver are mainly used for jewellery and other decorative items, awards, etc. There is of course some industrial use, but this is comparatively limited. Is the $, € or £ value really that much for a limited quantity of coins? Is it all worthwhile? I wonder.
I suppose that values are different this side of the "Pond". Although there are investors in precious metals, I think it fair to say that the "melt it" mentality is virtually non-existent here. Just two different ways of life perhaps.
Anyway, I've now got the two main things that annoy me (melt and modern replicas) off my chest, so now I can get down to some serious posting. I hope that I haven't offended anyone.
Bill.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
I think part of the confusion here lies in the multiple meanings of "melt". Yes, it can mean turning a coin into a raw metal form but it is also frequently used to indicate spot silver value, aka "melt value". A coin still has a melt value regardless of whether it is ever melted. The silver boom of 1979-80 did see the mass melting of many US coins but the number melted by private hands pales in comparison to the number of coins melted by the US Mint through the years. Nowadays, few coins are actually melted. Face value multiplier bags have become a very popular way of investing in silver bullion. The coins have a known weight and purity so there is no need for assaying expenses and it is easier to sell off coins than it is 100-1000 ounce bars. As for the melting of foreign coins by US collectors, that does not happen too much either due to non-standardized silver quantities in world coins that would lead to higher assay costs.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
321 Posts |
I've sold a lot of low grade silver coins in the last few months at "melt". In my opinion silver is way OVER valued. When oil and gas come back down, which they will, gold and silver will come down with them. So... "melt" your low grade silver while you can.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1143 Posts |
As long as there is fear about our currency we will see high prices for bullion. The trick is knowing when to jump ship.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The Mints themselves have no qualms about the re melting of coins. It is one of their main sources of metal for the production of current coin. Always has been, throughout history. There is a race on currently, between the Royal Canadian Mint and collectors to extract pure nickel nickels from circulation. Collectors want to keep 'em for their melt value, the RCM wants them back for alloy production in the manufacture of new coins.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 4,938 |
|