| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 6,013 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
651 Posts |
ElleKitty have we weighed your 2nd coin at the meeting? At the same time weigh the 1st coin too. I'll e-mail you something that got me searching for other examples
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
819 Posts |
Razo, no they have not been weighed. Slightly embarrassing but I have never picked up a scale. Until just recently I haven't really needed one. I will bring them with me to Luby's on Thursday.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
ElleKitty The Morelos stamp as seen on the various SUD issues needs an entire volume by itself. Several researchers have attempted to do so but I do not own any of their books unfortunately. I became interested in the SUD coinage for a very brief period of time while I was in High School but with me it never really caught on because of the endless minute varieties of the series and the fact that well known forgeries were often treated as real by collectors and dealers alike. I prefered the forgeries that passed undetected - the 8Rs. These SUDs were very popular as souveniers and keepsales after the war was over. But the supply of originals was never adequate to meet the demand. So a cottage industry developed around these coins and numerous "new" varieties and fantasies started to appear almost from the outset. The fact that they have virtually no intrinsic value and the crudity of the dies made them easy targets. The stamps on the photos look like typical "originals". But always be aware that the technology needed to produce great forgeries of this type is within the grasp of most high School kids that take metal shop... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
819 Posts |
Mr. Swamperbob- Thank you for taking the time to look at them! As always your expertise on coins and their forgeries astounds me. And I am glad of the "good news", there is still a chance they're original. :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Czech Republic
803 Posts |
jfransch, I believe you are correct about the Villagran stamp. When compared to known examples I was able to find, you see the differences clearly. As you've mentioned, there's no sign of the inner circle of dots along the edge. Also, position of the letters is wrong - on the stamp I've seen, first "L" in "VILLA" is positioned in between "R" and "A" in "GRAN". OSORNO monogram is very well done (too well, actually) however on the original stamps I was able to find the leg in "R" has more of a sharp angle which takes it further out away from the rest of the monogram.
swamperbob, when I included the close-ups of some peculiarities on the coin, I was hoping you'd be able to match the host to a known type. Your knowledge in this field is unparalleled! I couldn't find an explanation for all the coarse and multi-directional (especially in the Villagran case) die surface marks and your explanation was a nugget of knowledge I'll file away for future references :)
Thank you for taking time and providing your opinions on these 2 coins. This is what the hobby is all about, in my mind.
ElleKitty, as was mentioned by swamperbob, there are a lot of varieties to the copper SUD series. Until his post, however, I didn't know why. From what I've seen, there's nothing that would raise a red flag for me. However I would love to hear fcrazo's opinion on the matter.
Regards,
Roman.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
651 Posts |
Me and ElleKitty attend the same clubs. I initially saw the coin 1st as it was offered, but no money. I've seen the talks here in CCF about the recent rash of fake counterstamps on host coins.
In fact the site that I have mentioned before, CoinforgeryEbay on Flickr, brought me to make presentaions on forgeries. The Flickr site offered examples of slabs, contemporaries, Chinese, and then the real host with modern C/S.
The coin that ElleKitty was bought from a retired dealer here my area. With him I've had some success in acquiring some rarities as he has some major connections. He Even knows you Swamperbob.
The coin is sharp looking, but is well rounded. The C/S is also very sharp.
I don't have enough expertise to make a conclusion. As mentioned we will weigh this coin and another for comparison.
I post some of my findings later once we have a club meeting this coming Thursday. We will also discuss at our next Mexican Coin Club meeting on the 30th of June.
|
|
Valued Member
Mexico
53 Posts |
TwoK: The "Norte" counterstamp is often attributed to Vicente Guerrero, not to Lopez Rayon. The counterstamp is found, as you have seen in the Ponterio Catalogs, usually in 1 or 2 reales coins that have been "flattened" completely. Even though Guerrero was active the whole 11 year period, the coins are often associated with the last period of the war, 1817-1821. So it being on an 1813 Zs assayer RP coin would be rare and on an 8 reales even rarer. As pointed earlier the general configuration is adequate but the design is wrong. The combination with a Lopez Rayon's SJGN would almost be impossible as this counterstamp is from 1811-1814. Also as you pointed out, the accepted design is within a circle.
Additional info that should be useful in identifying suspicious coins, in regards to your second coin TwoK, is the fact that counterstamps are generally found on low cast planchet silver coins (called tepuzque) or another revolutionary emergency issues or period coins. Earlier than 1811 are a "wrong" normal dates to find War of Independence Counterstamps.
In regards to the Morelos SUD coins, SwamperBob would you remember the reference about them being in high demand as souvenirs and being extensively copied after the independence war, it must be an interesting read!
To add to the knowledge base, those SUD coins were extensively forged and copied in the Morelos' War of Independence period of 1811 to 1814. Morelos issued a decree in 1813 that all coins, including the forgeries, would be counterstamped to re-validate them as legal currency so the owners would not lose their money, so infinite varieties exist...
Unfortunately, the weight would not be a characteristic that determines if they are "good" or not, I have seen them from a "normal" planchet to a twice as thick planchet.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
Guadalupe Victoria The reference was one that I had access to in the early 1960s but I do not recall the specifics. It was as I recall a very small booklet. It could have been one of the Numismatic Scrapbooks. I just can not recall. It was owned by an older dealer in Mass who tutored me on Mexican coins. He loved the SUD varieties and was trying to get me interested in them.
I agree that the weight of SUD coinage was VERY variable - in fact worthless. The same goes for diameter. They were emergency issues and the manufacture says so.
I had also heard that many contemporary forgeries were made to pass as money. It makes sense - they were easy to copy.
In some cases, it appears that the coin blanks were made by sawing slices off a large copper rod. The coins made in that way, I always classify as being Modern. The edges of originals were as far as I know always hammered not rolled or drawn.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
651 Posts |
interesting note on the weights. I think in the 1950's or early 1960's Numismatists, there was an article on this subject that was compiled with other latin numismatic articles. Unfortunately, I just loaned that book to another friend.
|
| |
Replies: 24 / Views: 6,013 |