| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 1,854 |
|
Valued Member
United States
224 Posts |
Grade it.  Edited by TypeMaster
11/12/2006 11:01 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
66 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I think it reaches AU but agree that the surfaces aren't original.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
quote:
Originally posted by TypeMaster
Grade it.
I dont wanna! Edited by Bryan1315
11/10/2006 5:45 pm
|
|
New Member
Canada
33 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1454 Posts |
MS-64. I don't know anything about this series at all. This is just a big old hairy guess.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I will say AU50 on thisen
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
224 Posts |
quote:
Originally posted by Noxx
XF cleaned?
Is the foot separated from the sandal? Are the breasts intact without rub. Fingers separated? :0) Give it another try. |
|
Valued Member
United States
224 Posts |
Also, the talons! Look at the talons. What would you consider the % of the talons that are intact?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
224 Posts |
Just one more thing. If you are not convinced about the grade of the obverse, always look at the reverse. The reverse of a coin never stands alone. We all know that. But the reverse will never lie about the obverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
675 Posts |
I am really struggling with this one. I think there is a tiny bit of wear on the front breast, but I don't see any wear on the back. Also the toning is interesting, I can't tell if it's been cleaned.
I will throw out the AU-58.
Thundercoin
|
|
Valued Member
United States
224 Posts |
quote:
Originally posted by Thundercoin
I am really struggling with this one. I think there is a tiny bit of wear on the front breast, but I don't see any wear on the back. Also the toning is interesting, I can't tell if it's been cleaned.
I will throw out the AU-58.
Thundercoin
j Very good. You are on it. Keep going! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
675 Posts |
Keep going, huh....
Hmm.... Ok, its an AU-58, but its actually a lightly circulated proof. That's the only other thing I can think of.
Thundercoin
|
|
Valued Member
United States
224 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
quote:
Originally posted by TypeMaster
Coin graded MS 63
By whom? And, as someone who undoubtedly knows more about the issue than I, what's your opinion of the originality of the surfaces? |
|
New Member
Canada
33 Posts |
Gesh...lucky guess on my part  Edited by sarniaguy
11/13/2006 8:46 pm
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,854 |
Posted 11/10/2006 3:18 pm
