Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

8 Reales Coin

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 26 / Views: 4,228Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 07/24/2011  1:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Considering the coin's surface and the coins detail, I'll vote for fake (I don't know this coin set though)
New Member
Mohur's Avatar
United Kingdom
29 Posts
 Posted 07/24/2011  1:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mohur to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, the surface doesn't look very smooth. Bob, what do you think?
Edited by Mohur
07/24/2011 1:48 pm
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 07/24/2011  9:10 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Mohur Based on the pictures, I see very little that causes me serious concerns. But because of the surface roughness I would not say I am 100% convinced it is real however.

First of all - the coin is correct in all details and matches the Standard dies used at San Luis Potosi. The coin appears to be struck - there are visible flow erosion lines on the die. The coin is struck out of collar based on the irregular rim. The edge is upset in a manner typical of late Republican issues.

But a really good transfer die could copy some of that.

Second - I am unaware of a really well made forgery of this date. It is a common date so a high grade silver forgery is rather UNLIKELY. An off metal strike would be fairly easy to detected by weight and density. Therefore, if this coin is the correct size, weight and density, it is most likely real.

The surface roughness has been pointed out. Some of that is actually due to bag marking in the fields - not all of it is due to a pebble surfaced die. The coin photos are so bright and reflective that bagging can be missed. There is what may be a raised dot (die chip) at about the 11 o'clock position between the rays. That feature is the ONLY one that causes me real concern - but it is a single isolated item. There are not a bunch of them however so one is always possible.

So then I looked for signs of a worn die (where an orange peel surface would be expected). I do not see many indications of a seriously worn die, which pushes me toward the idea of a possible forgery. That said, the photo is once again too bright and high contrast to be sure.

The offsetting factor for me is that Potosi is noted for dies with poor surfaces. They did have problems in their die shop and rusty dies were used. If I saw this same surface on a Mexico City coin it would bother me an awful lot more, but this is Potosi. So in the end I do not see enough to say it is bad.

So overall, if I saw this coin posted on ebay, I would say it is REAL and I am about 80% convinced of that statement.

Nothing takes the place of an in-person inspection, but if the coin is the correct - SIZE - WEIGHT and DENSITY I would say it is REAL period.
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2011  02:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The more I read about this coin set, the more I think I'll end collecting it someday :D Actually, I didn't liked the coins 'orange skin' surface - but then your explanations makes it clear that it is a non issue there.
The other details are excellent, and the eagle is just awesome :)

BTW, how comes Potossi was minting mexican coins, thought they were independent since 1821 ? (they were just helping out in order to mint enough coins ?)
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2011  03:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MathieuMa Potosi in this case (Mexico) refers to San Luis Potosi not Potosi, Bolivia. San Luis Potosi is located in Central Mexico south east of Mexico City. It is noted for a very moist environment which is part of the reason for "rusty dies" being encountered there.
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2011  04:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OK, that explains it all :D Thanks !
New Member
Mohur's Avatar
United Kingdom
29 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2011  11:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mohur to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Bob - Thanks such an informative post... I can now refer back to it for any future 8 reales I like the look of... alas that one posted above has now sold ... but I'm sure there will be others out there
Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2011  12:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I was surprised to see that the "dragon teeth" were visible on the photograph at the this distance and resolution. Usually it's a tell-tale sign of a forgery, due to teeth being too long, but it doesn't appear to be the case here.
Pillar of the Community
tokenmast's Avatar
United States
648 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2011  12:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tokenmast to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OK I'll "Bite"

Quote:
"dragon teeth" were visible on the photograph

Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2011  1:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Dragon teeth is an anti-counterfeit feature on standardized dies and looks like two tiny teeth, one on each side of the bottom middle ray.

Here's what it looks like:

8-Reales-Coin

And here's what mr Swamperbob had to say about "dragon teeth" in one of his e-mails to me back in 2006:


Quote:
The dragon's teeth were first added as an Anti-counterfeiting measure to the Mexico City dies in 1867 when they adopted what Dunigan refers to as the 1867 to 1897 die style. I split that style down because the Standardized hubs were not produced until about 1870-75 at Mexico City and they made minor variations after that date until 1887. The change in the snake's head is the final major change that identifies the final Standard die type (at least for me). But there are quite a few old dies used in the transition and some old snakes heads show up on later dated coins.

The Standardized dies were introduced to the branch mints in different years. All were supposed to be converted by 1887. The last converted was Potosi - so there are actually Non-standard 1887 8Rs but only for Potosi.

To understand Standardized dies you have to avoid thinking like a modern US coin collector. US hub designs change but not as often as Mexican dies did. A Standardized die was one made in the die shop at Mexico City. They made new hubs periodically (annually or less) so there are minor variations of a type not seen on US coins. The branch mints especially Zacatecas tried to mimic the Mo design before 1887 perhaps to keep their die sinking jobs - who knows. The Zs dies before 1887 are VERY similar to Mo produced dies. But the real standard dies were the ones made at Mexico City. Some mints used Mexico City master (King) punches and added their own details for some time - Chihuahua and Hermosillo for example. But ALL branch mints were brought under central control in about 1887. That is about the time Mexico started taxing overseas bullion coins and took production control away from the mine owners and mint leasees.

I know this can get complex and I always get a bit confused on this transition - because no sooner do I think I have it down pat than I find an 8R made from a die that causes a date to change.

Here is a quick list of approximate dates: (approximate because of carry over die usage and the issues I addressed quickly above)

Alamos 1887
Chihuahua 1868 (Although not mentioned by Dunigan some dies with Dragon's Teeth)
there are both kinds in 1868. The Standardized hubs of the Mo style are used
continually after 1870 with minor detail changes until the end of the series. The Ca mint
seems to have started using Mo made dies VERY Early on.
Culiacan 1887
Durango 1887
Guadalajara 1887
Guanajuato 1887
Hermosillo 1881 (Mexico City style using local lettering until 1887) Full Standardization
begins in 1887
Oaxaca 1881 starts using Mo dies with teeth - minor variations seen until 1884.
San Luis Potosi 1887 is a transitional year - the 1887 NON-STANDARD Pi coins are the
last ones of the kind issued. They are SCARCE - try to find one!
Zacatecas 1882 is the first time the teeth appear on SOME of the full J types. The 1882-1887
Zs issues are close copies of the Mo style but they were not made from Mo produced
dies until 1887.

The 1882 Zs transition produce some of odd types. There are two Js - straight and Full. But the ones with the Full J come in two mint styles Zs (as expected) and Go. There are at least two dies in the Go style with Zs lettering (borrowed dies?) and there are mules of the styles. Some are considered RARE. I have been cherry picking 1882 Zs coins for years.


Pillar of the Community
tokenmast's Avatar
United States
648 Posts
 Posted 07/25/2011  1:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tokenmast to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank You TwoKopeiki and Swamperbob 5 years later ? and/or 5yr old Swamperbob? Time travel
  Previous TopicReplies: 26 / Views: 4,228Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.49 seconds to rattle this change. Forums