| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,231 |
|
|
New Member
United States
45 Posts |
Edited by Chadstacey69
08/07/2011 10:14 am
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
MS63....It looks like mine graded by PCGS
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2224 Posts |
Chad, I saw this CC in my Morgan post. It looks really nice. The strikes on the face and the line on the left from 9-11 oclock might hold it back from getting a 64, but other than that it's a sweet coin. If its in the GSA slab, you sending it to NGC to maintain its originality?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
I would say ms-62 with the reverse being a lot better
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I would give this a MS-63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1064 Posts |
MS-62 or MS-62+, thinking marks on obverse would keep it from grading higher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
817 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
45 Posts |
Thank you very much I'm going post some pics of my other morgans soon for opinions.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1150 Posts |
Whatever it grades, it is a nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I don't think this would ever grade below a 63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
Very close to MS64...Nice!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
361 Posts |
I also agree with 63. If you send them to NGC they will keep them in the GSA holders.
|
|
New Member
United States
45 Posts |
Thank you very much for your opinions |
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,231 |
|
Posted 08/07/2011 11:14 am
