Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

A Good Video From My Boy Ron

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 2,643Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
nod2003's Avatar
United States
3294 Posts
 Posted 09/08/2011  3:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nod2003 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No, you still would need the IRS because the government is going to want to check for people trying to cheat. And if you think the IRS is a hideous bureaucracy, then you are absolutely right.
Valued Member
LastGold's Avatar
United States
228 Posts
 Posted 09/08/2011  6:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add LastGold to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
nod:

What I am referring to is a nationally administered flat rate SALES tax! An extra tax collected at the time of purchase on everything purchased by anyone in the country! That means you get to tax thieves, drug lords, prostitutes, gangsters, even illegals - because everyone eats, buys clothes etc...

Such a tax would encourage savings, and because it would be absolutely inescapable - there would be no need for an oversight body (like the IRS) to administer it! In addition, think of how much productivity we would save by doing away with the reams of paperwork that businesses and individuals must confront each year - just to satisfy the IRS! The savings in time, energy and grief alone would be enormous!

Best,

LastGold
Pillar of the Community
Ed_B's Avatar
United States
4008 Posts
 Posted 09/08/2011  9:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ed_B to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
But you can bet that those entrenched in power in that bureaucracy will fight to their last breath to maintain the status quo...

I can live with that. Get a rope, boys!


Quote:
Even with a flat tax, we would still need the IRS, but at least we could reduce their size by 90+%.

I agree, Nod. Someone will ALWAYS try to game the system, no matter what system it is. A small but efficient IRS would be needed to pursue these miscreants.

If taxes were small, fair, easy to pay, and the penalties for not paying severe it is likely that there would be far less tax cheating going on than there is now. A simple tax system would be much easier to administer and would not consume a huge amount of time and money to implement and operate. The usual suspects that benefit from the current system would resist, however. They need to be crushed.
Pillar of the Community
nod2003's Avatar
United States
3294 Posts
 Posted 09/09/2011  08:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nod2003 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Did anyone notice that despite Ron Paul winning the debate, that the major news networks didn't even mention him and instead only talked about Perry and Romney?
Valued Member
Ron2012Paul's Avatar
175 Posts
 Posted 09/09/2011  2:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ron2012Paul to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That's normal. After every debate he's the least talked about candidate. They did the same thing to him in 2008.
Pillar of the Community
Ed_B's Avatar
United States
4008 Posts
 Posted 09/09/2011  6:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ed_B to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Did anyone notice that despite Ron Paul winning the debate, that the major news networks didn't even mention him and instead only talked about Perry and Romney?

For the past 15+ years, the so-called mainstream media has taken it upon itself not to just report the news but to shape and bend it to fit their own political agenda, whenever possible. Ron Paul, despite being a congressman, is not part of the accepted political establishment. Therefore, he is not in bed with the press. Because of this, they seek to marginalize him via the absolute minimum of coverage. I'm sure that they would say, "But after all, if what he had to say was "news worthy", we would cover him more fully". In this case, the term "news worthy" translates to "supporting our agenda". Since RP does not support the liberal media agenda, he's an "out" while Romney and Perry, who do support the liberal media and are part of the political establishment, are "ins". As they would put it, Ron Paul just isn't "house broken".

  Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 2,643Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums